Gambling in Oz

No, it’s not about O’Reilly running a pool over who gets shanked next. Rather, this post concerns Australian wagering habits. They apparently gamble a lot. From The Age:

Australia’s passion for a punt continues to grow, with new figures showing a record $128.3 billion – $8,571 per adult – was wagered last financial year.

Australians lost more than $15.3 billion – an average of $1,026 per person aged 18 or over – as they pumped money into poker machines, casino games and state and territory coffers.

This equates to 3.41 per cent of the average household disposable income.

The previous year, Australians wagered about $125 billion, losing more than $15 billion – $1,016 per adult.

The figures were released by the Tasmanian Gaming Commission, which compiles the national report from data provided by all states and territories.

Northern Territorians were the biggest losers per capita, wasting an average $1,806 each on the pokies, horses, casinos, lotteries and other forms of gambling.

NSW punters followed to the tune of $1,248, while Victorians lost $1,133.

In the ACT, the average loss was $1,070, in Queensland $882, South Australia $754, and Tasmania $759.

West Australians – who have pokies in Perth’s Burswood Casino but not in pubs and clubs – fared best, losing just $460.

Of the total amount of money wagered, most was pumped into gaming machines, where more than $90 billion was spend nationwide – up almost six per cent on the previous year.

Casinos received an injection of more than $17 billion, representing a decrease of 1.4 per cent, while the TAB enjoyed a 4.5 per cent surge to a national turnover of $11.3 billion.

Government revenue from gambling topped $3.9 billion in 2002-03, a rise of about $150 million from the previous year

Aussie gambling passion grows

Even keeping in mind exchange rates (the Australian dollar is worth considerably less than its American counterpart), Australians gamble quite significantly. Anyone from down under care to comment?
______________________________

Strange slots

I’m always amazed at the things that get turned into slot machines. One of the hallmarks of the slot machine is that, like the lottery, it has democratized gambling–you don’t need a big bankroll or any skill–just push “max bet” and hope for the best.

Still, this might be taking it too far.
so is losing for geniuses?
I’ve always thought that those “for dummies” books were needlessly insulting, and now, as captured in this image from a major Strip casino, it seems they have extended their franchise to slots.

Then there’s this one, which truly mystifies me.
eat up!

It just looks hideous, and the eye in the “B” and tounge sticking out of the “a” don’t help. I really think that if you were to create a parody of a casino, you would will it with slots like these.

Then there’s this, the Beverly Hillbillies, which makes perfect sense for a slot machine, because the Hillbillies lucked into sudden, life-changing wealth.
Jed Clampett
Still, the fistfulls of cash push this display perilously close to some kind of avant-garde artform.

Finally, there is a machine that is tragically unappreciated.
Herman and his family
Herman Munster simply rules. The problem with today’s world is that too many people want to be Grandpa–always making sarcastic comments and putting people down–and no one wants to be Herman. Sure, he goofs things up most of the time, but at least he tries.

It’s strange–a few years ago, the Addams Family slot was huge. I wonder why the Munsters never caught on. Probably the lack of a bonus round. It looks like a regular mechanical/electronic 3-reeler with Munsters graphics.
___________________________________