Deer folly turns tragic

I had a story that seemed to be a barrell of laughs, until some hammerheads in the Pennsylvania Game Commission ruined it. It begins with a deer living in Southwest Philadelphia who decided to get some takeout fried chicken, in the neighborhood of 52nd and Baltimore (not that far from where I once lived, at 43rd and Chester). From NBC-10, via MSNBC:


A scared deer trapped four people in a Philadelphia restaurant for about an hour last night, before the people escaped through a basement hatch.

The deer darted into Royal Fried Chicken, a Southwest Philadelphia fast food restaurant, at 7:15 p.m. on Wednesday. The unusual visitor quickly drew a crowd outside the restaurant.

Four people, including Shaahalmi, were trapped inside the restaurant for more than an hour. They locked themselves in a back room to stay away from the frightened deer until they escaped through the hatch.

“I was like ‘open the back door,’ and they opened the back door and then we ran in the back and started screaming and deer started trying to get back to the door where were at, attacking us,” said Tawana Coleman. “My heart just dropped. I never seen this before in my life. It was like a dream,” said Danaya Rousseau.

Police believe the buck came from Cobb’s Creek Park looking for food. The park is about 10 blocks away from the restaurant.

Police say the deer was seen around the neighborhood throughout the day.

Officers say they unsuccessfully tried to corral the buck a few blocks away from the restaurant. But the deer kept running and when the door to the restaurant was open, the deer ran right in.

The young buck was eventually tranquilized. It only suffered some scratches and was taken back to Cobbs Creek Park. Officials say the deer will be released back into the wild.

Great story, huh? I’ve got some pictures for you:

deer
The deer inside Royal Fried Chicken

deer
Police on the scene

deer
The deer is waiting…

deer
This is a 500-pound buck. Are you going to tell him to leave?

I somehow doubt the deer was “attacking” anyone. He was probably pretty scared. Still, I guess that 500 pounds of scared deer is pretty intimidating. But what should have been an amusing story about the city encroaching on nature became a sickening tale of bureaucratic cruelty. From NBC-10:

Pennsylvania Game Commission officials told NBC 10 on Thursday that a deer involved in a well-publicized incident at a local restaurant has been euthanized.

Originally, officials said the deer only suffered some scratches and was to be taken back to Cobbs Creek Park and released back into the wild.

However, the game official said the deer was put to sleep because archery deer season opens on Saturday, and there was the possibility that a hunter shooting that deer would get contaminated meat.

The game official also said the deer’s meat would not be safe to eat within 35 days of being tranquilized.

Deer Euthanized After Restaurant Adventure

People who know me would hardly identify me as some tree-hugger, but I think that this is outrageous. The deer wasn’t bothering anyone, and wasn’t hostile at all. If you look at the video, you can see that the deer is visibly frightened or at the very least out of breath.

Couldn’t they have let the otherwise-healthy deer spend a month in the zoo or on a farm or something? I wonder if the Pennsylvania Game Commission has ever heard the expression, “Throwing the baby out with the bathwater?” Let’s see…the meat might be unsafe to eat if a hunter happens to shoot this deer…let’s kill it just to be sure nothing bad happens.

If you think this was as needlessly stupid as I do, you can email the commissioner in charge of that district of Pennsylvania.

Antigua update, Jay Cohen will speak

The ecommerce times has a great recap of Antigua’s WTO case, which is the subject of my panel at G2E:

The U.S. government decided recently to negotiate with, rather than litigate against, the Caribbean islands of Antigua and Barbuda (both referred to as Antigua) over the issue of online gaming. This decision came about after the U.S. lost an arbitration proceeding under the trade dispute resolution process of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in March.

The arbitration arose out of a complaint by Antigua to the WTO in the aftermath of a U.S. move in 1998 to fight Internet gambling by bringing charges against Jay Cohen, an American then living in Antigua.

In the wake of Cohen’s conviction, the government of Antigua filed a complaint against the U.S. at the WTO and claimed that the U.S. was not recognizing its own global trade commitments.

Specifically, Antigua alleged that the position held by the U.S. that gambling and betting services provided by operators in Antigua to persons located in the United States is illegal was in violation of American commitments under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (the GATS). The U.S. countered by arguing that the provision of gambling and betting services to the U.S. was not a part of its commitments under GATS.

A WTO arbitration panel upheld the complaint by Antigua. The panel found that Internet gambling restrictions imposed by the U.S. did, in fact, violate U.S. commitments under GATS. The panel also rejected Washington’s defense that the United States never intended to include gambling services under GATS.

Estimates are that there are 1,800 Internet gambling operations, and almost all of them are outside the United States. One estimate is that the global Internet gaming market will grow from US$10 billion in 2002 to $14.5 billion in 2006.

With figures such as these, it is no wonder that a number of countries are joining the online gambling business as opposed to trying to fight it — for example, earlier this year, the Philippines government authorized the set-up of an online casino, which will pay half its earnings to the Philippines government.

Internet Gambling — Regulate or Litigate?

If you are interested in this issue, you should definitely attend my panel session at the Global Gaming Expo, “Legal Limbo: How the Wire Act Impacts Online Gambling.”

Jay Cohen will be appearing in public for the first time since his release from prison, and will definitely have many things to say about the Wire Act. Bob Blumenfeld, an attorney for Antigua in the WTO case, will speak to the legal challenges raised by Antigua. All in all, it should be a very dynamic presentation, and a good thing to do on Wednesday, October 6 from 3 to 4.

Shatner/Rollins duet

I’ve heard pieces of William Shatner’s recorded work, and I always thought that he and former Black Flag/Rollins Band/ spoken word artist Henry Rollins would eventually collaborate. Actually, I never even came close to thinking about that. But, according to NME.com, it has happened:


Almost 35 years since the release of his debut album, William Shatner, television�s Captain Kirk and TJ Hooker has teamed up with esteemed singer-songwriter Ben Folds (as his producer/co-writer) to deliver what can only be described as one of the least highly anticipated albums of the year. Although not a �witty and self-deprecating poet� as he has been described, Shatner�s album, titled ‘Has Been’, includes some surprisingly good pop-driven collaborations with Lemon Jelly, Henry Rollins, novelist Nick Hornby, and here he covers Pulp�s classic ‘Common People’ with Joe Jackson.

Hear William Shatner’s sensational version of ‘Common People’ now on NME.COM – NME.COM

I clicked through and listened to “Common People.” It was absolutely amazing. In a related story, Shatner also covered a version of Gary Numan’s “Cars,” which does not appear to be on the current album. Bummer.

Anyone who saw Free Enterprise appreciates Mr. Shatner’s take on Julius Caesar. Check out more Shatner vocal excursions at farpointstation.

The big picture

The world’s economy is slowing down, but gaming has expanded. If you’ve got $3000–yes, that’s $3000 American–to spend, you can read all the details, or you can see what I cut and pasted from the press release on yahoo:

The 3rd Global Gambling Review: Double or Quits? is now available from Casino City Press, the exclusive North American distributor. The Review provides an accurate assessment of the size of each sector and the overall market for both land-based and interactive gambling for the years 2001 through 2003 with market projections for 2004 to 2012.

The Review opens with an overview of the global gambling industry covering the size, turnover, yield, and revenues of the land-based and online betting, gaming, and lottery markets. The 900-page volume provides detailed information on gaming markets around the world and aggregate global data. Over 800 tables and charts are included with effective turnover by jurisdiction and product, cross-reference lists, and much more.

The gaming industry has seen substantial growth worldwide and a surge in market value in recent years. During 2003 the net total lost by the world’s gamblers (gross gambling yield) to the industry was $208 billion up 12.2% from $185 billion during 2000, the year focused on by GBGC’s 2nd Review, the widely acclaimed “Global Gambling Comes of Age”, which tracked the industry during the pioneering days of gambling on the Internet.

Projections in the 3rd Review suggest that continuing rapid development of Indian gaming in the US and the spread of sports betting via the Internet could enable the industry to maintain its impressive growth and see gross gambling yield pass the $250 billion mark by 2008 and $275 billion by 2012.

Global Gambling Expands as World Economy Slows

Go to Casino City Rress to order all 900 pages. If I have money in our acquisitions budget, I will get a copy for the Gaming Collection.

Mooncake gambling

This might be the coolest story I’ve discussed yet. Mooncake gambling exists, and it is a thriving recreation in a Chinese city. From China Daily:

in Xiamen, a coastal city of East China’s Fujian Province, you find a pack of six dice inside after opening every gaudily-decorated box of mooncakes.

Gambling? Right, but it is definitely legal. Because the stakes among the locals are mooncakes – and that is how this unique celebrating activity has got its Chinese name “Bo Bing.” It is played only around the Mid-Autumn Festival.

The Mid-Autumn Festival falls on the 15th day of the 8th month of the Chinese lunar calendar, and in this year it falls on Septemper 28.

For centuries, the Mid-Autumn Festival has encouraged family reunions, big feasts and enjoyment of a beautiful full moon. Seriously, I think this will appear in chapter 2, 3, or 4.

But for people in Xiamen, their exciting games have just started.

Easy to play though, the games have quite complicated rules hard to remember. So it is thoughtful for some mooncake manufacturers to print the rules on the package.

All the “Bo Bing” game requires are six dice and a china bowl. Just throw the dice into the bowl – and the different pips you get stand for different ranks of awards you will win.

When walking along streets in this tiny island during this time, you will hear the pleasant silvery sound of the dice rolling. Cheers of winning or loss are everywhere.

The 300-year-old custom of mooncake gambling dates back to the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911). The inventor, Zheng Chenggong (1624-62), a general of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), stationed his army in Xiamen. Zheng was determined to recover Taiwan, which was occupied by Dutch invaders since 1624.

When every Mid-Autumn Festival came, the soldiers naturally missed their families but fought with heroical determination to drive off the aggressors.

General Zheng and his lower officer Hong Xu invented mooncake gambling to help relieve homesickness among the troops.

The gambling game has six ranks of awards, which are named as the winners in ancient imperial examinations, and has 63 different sized mooncakes as prizes.

Mooncake gambling odds-on festival favourite

This is fascnating–people gambling on cakes to commemorate the bravery of soldiers nearly four hundred years ago. We in the United States should have hoecake gambling to remember General Washington’s troops at Valley Forge. I don’t know if they gambled on hoecakes, but I remember reading once that hoecakes were one of Washington’s favorite foods.

Anyway, there’s more to this story. Apparently, commercialization is ruining the mooncake holiday:

Meanwhile, about 82 percent of locals surveyed said that current mooncakes tend to be overpackaged and too extravagant, and 70 percent of respondents consider it necessary for the government to set rules on mooncake packages, the survey indicated.

Earlier this month, a department store in Xiamen, Fujian Province was found selling “top gift mooncakes” for 9,999 yuan, claiming that the pastry is made of shark fins and other pricey fillings.

Zhang youde, a sociologist at Shanghai University, said the changing consumption trend has already spoiled mooncakes’ original flavor.

“Purchase of mooncakes has now been commercialized to meet business needs in the modern society and has even become a form of bribery. However, its original meaning of family reunion has been greatly weakened,” Zhang said.

Mooncakes take on new meaning

There are also concerns that mooncakes are simply too expensive now: Why are mooncake prices so, so high? Read the article–you can even buy mooncakes on ebay.

Apparently, mooncakes, which usually run around $3, can cost as much as $180, because they are bundled with luxury items in the packaging. Sound like software or textbook purchases to me.

Here’s a giant mooncake:

mammoth mooncake

Yet there’s good news. For the mooncake purist who wants to reject the glitzy, commercialized mooncake offerings, you can always make them yourself.

Look for this in ROLL THE BONES. Seriously, this will be in there somewhere. When you get your brand new copy in April 2006, just look in the index under “mooncake,” and you’ll be able to say that you read it first on dieiscast.

Stop studying, start playing poker

Like many people who read my blog, you may be a college student who is interested in gambling. Well, if you are, the 2nd Annual College Poker Championship might be for you! Or not. It’s free to enter, which I guess means that it’s not technically gambling (and therefore presumably not a violation of the Wire Act). Of course, I’m neither a lawyer nor an employee of the Justice Department, so I wouldn’t stake much on my opinion. Anyway, here’s the press release, which showed up in my email inbox this morning:


Los Angeles, CA (September 28, 2004) � Finally, weary college students have a legitimate excuse to take their next study break, all while keeping a college tradition alive and competing for thousands of dollars. The online College Poker Championship tournament series has taken the poker phenomenon to the next level in its search for the �Best Texas Hold �em, No Limit College Poker Player in the World.� University college students worldwide now have the opportunity to compete against each other for scholarship awards in excess of $100,000, plus a seat at the Land Based Grand Final, an all-expense paid trip for two to Cancun, Mexico and V.I.P. tickets to the exotic College Poker Championship spring break party. The College Poker Championship tournament is entirely free, providing students with the opportunity to play their hands at the hottest game around and vie for cash awards, all at a price that any college student can afford.

Hosted by Lou Krieger, co-author of Poker for Dummies and Internet Poker: How to Play and Beat Online Poker Games, The Annual College Poker Championship Land Based Grand Final, to be held on March 16, 2005 in Cancun, Mexico, will determine $84,500 in scholarship awards, with the winner laying claim to the �Best Texas Hold �em, No Limit College Poker Player in the World� title and taking home an astounding $40,000. In addition, charitable donations amounting to $10,000 will be made to any charity or organization designated by the winners. All events are played with tournament chips and no purchase is ever required to qualify for any award.

�From fraternity houses to off-campus cigar shops, colleges everywhere have a fine poker-playing tradition. It seems natural to hold a poker tournament where students from all colleges can come together and test their skills, while competing for huge scholarship awards,� explains Krieger, renowned professional poker player and best-selling author. �College Poker Championship gives any college student the chance to be a champion and walk away with thousands of dollars!”

The tournament runs for just over six months, awarding $500 in scholarship awards each week. The top 10% of players from the 25 qualifying rounds, known as �Super Satellites,� will move on to the �Satellite Event� to compete for $5000 in scholarship awards. The top 20% of players from this round secure a place in the Online Final, in which players who place 11th to 80th will share $5500 in scholarship awards, while players placing 1st to 10th will each win a seat at The 2nd Annual College Poker Championship Land Based Grand Final, a trip for two to Cancun, Mexico, where the tournament will be held, and V.I.P. tickets to the College Poker Championship spring break party.

College Poker Championship is a non-profit entity that receives sponsorship funds and tournament support from RoyalVegasPoker.com. For more information, please visit www.CollegePokerChampionship.com.

Is poker your ticket to a better life? The probabilities say no. Is this worth taking even one second away from studying? I don’t think so. But if you’ve got the time and the inclination, you might as well give it a shot.

Of course, you do have to download the “free” RoyalVegasPoker.com software to participate. I’m leery of downloading any software, particularly gambling software. One or more of the student workers at Special Collections has installed online casino software on the student computers, and we had to basically reimage the hard drive to get it off. I really liked that every time someone accessed a page relating to gambling (something that we do a bit here), we got a flood of online casino pop-ups.

Of course, if you access the Internet from a public computer that is reimaged with every new user anyway, you wouldn’t have this problem. Still, I would guess that if you’re sitting at a computer lab or library computer during finals week playing poker while people have research papers to write, you might not be the most popular person on campus.

Ranting about ESPN

Watching that ESPN series on sports and gambling, something struck me as odd, but I wasn’t sure exactly what it was, until I read this, from John Schwarb of the St. Pete Times:

Not to pile on too much against ESPN (in this space last week we questioned its anchors being advertising pitchmen), but we could have lived without the five-part SportsCenter series “Gambling in Sports: The National Pastime” last week.

For one thing, the packaging of it with the ballyhooed Hustle movie was far too cute. We’re not stupid, we could see the network trying to work us into a degenerate gambling froth, preferably one that would end Saturday night on the couch with their latest foray into original programming.

Parts of the SportsCenter series were laughable, others lazy and less informative than they should have been. A segment on the point-shaving scandal with the 1993-94 Arizona State men’s basketball team relied on old interviews with all parties, failing to show what the guilty are doing now.

A segment on poker’s underbelly – young people spending countless hours and money playing online – rang hollow considering how much ESPN promotes this foolishness. The network is not to blame for an individual’s decision to mortgage the future on card games, but after glorifying poker for hours every week, showing a few minutes on its dark side seems trite.

On the whole, it is hilarious to watch SportsCenter turn into 60 Minutes when “investigating” gambling. The undertones of betting on an all-sports network are constant, either in subtle forms (the never-ending ticker) or in your face (“Hammerin”‘ Hank Goldberg’s Sunday morning football picks).

Perhaps any investigations could start within the Bristol, Conn., offices, where Mike Freeman reported in his 2000 book ESPN: The Uncensored History that gambling was rampant.

Instead, we’re subjected to a five-part series ending in a Pete Rose movie. Oh, well, we watched it all, so you win, ESPN. Again.

Rant: ESPN gambling series comical

Now I remember what was so odd: the channel that ran a countdown clock on their bottom line that ticked off the seconds until the next episode of the WSOP being a little sanctimonious about gambling. It’s great when people and organizations contradict themselves so blatantly that this transcends hypocrisy.

Not all TV is bad–a new episode of The Wire aired last night. It’s honestly the only show that I regularly watch, and it just keeps getting better.

Nostlagia on the 405

Friday morning, Sept 24, I woke up at 4:30 to catch an early-morning flight to Los Angeles to be part of the online gaming summit sponsored by BetOnSports. Now, some people who I’ve showed the site to have responded with glassy-eyed polite silence, making me think it’s probably pretty crappy. Other people, when I tell them to go to dieiscast.com, get really confused, which is why you can also get here through www.davidgschwartz.info. But people who tell me they like the site say they delight in learning more about my worldview.

So here’s my thoughts on Los Angeles, either the biggest or second-biggest metropolis in the United States, and the place where I spent four years or so in graduate school (UCLA).

I had a very strange feeling flying in to LAX and getting a rental car, flashing back to the time nine years ago when I first came to LA to scout for an apartment as a hopeful would-be graduate student. Tempus fugit, huh? Now, I remember that last time I was in DC I thought that people there were very rude, and I started to think that maybe it was my becoming a West Coast softee, overly sensitized to the brusqueness of life in the East. Not true, because luckily the woman “helping” me at the Hertz car rental counter made a real effort to be unpleasant (though she did say she liked my tie). In all fairness, if I was stuck behind a car rental counter at 9 AM when it was 80 degrees and sunny outside, I’d be a little snippy too.

After getting the car, I had a breakfast reunion with my dissertation chair, Eric Monkkonen, who I credit with a) helping me get through the dissertation process and b) letting me work in an area that other historians might not have. After that, it was down to the beach–either El Segundo or Manhattan Beach, right off PCH where the steam plant is. Not that I laid on the beach or went in the ocean–I was wearing my suit for the summit, so I just wandered around a little. Getting up to the summit on the 405 north proved a little daunting–traffic is as bad as ever. Now, because I spent 4 years in LA, I knew enough to take the surface streets–Sepulveda Blvd. in this case. It was neat seeing parts of my old extended neighborhood. The Lucky’s that I used to buy groceries at is now a Trader Joe’s, not a bad change.

In general, I noticed two things about outdoor advertisements. There are still casino billboards: MGM Grand’s read “Come home tired” (which is something that commuters probably do every day), and I also saw a few for Excalibur. Second, where in Las Vegas we have tons of strip club and escort service billboards, LA has scores of them about TV shows. I learned more about TV in a few hours driving around LA than I had in months of living in an apartment with a television. Did you know, for example, that Mariska Hagartay is going to be in a Lifetime movie? I forget the title, but it was probably something like Innocent Deception, Seductive Betrayal, or A Mother’s Love.

Cool moment of the day: driving down Avenue of the Stars, I passed under the bridge shot in the riot/uprising scene in Conquest of the Planet of the Apes.

bridge over Ave. of Stars!

Anyway, driving under that bridge always cracks me up, because I think about Ricardo Montalban saying “Lousy human bastard!”

The summit was great–it was at the Century City Park Hyatt. There is a major construction project on Santa Monica Blvd that I’m sure is making traffic there pleasant.

Afterwards, I went down to Venice Beach to get some reading done and observe the fauna. Now, I sometimes think that I’m a bit eccentric (I do, after all, maintain an online image gallery of casino carpet), but it seems like many of the people down there are flat-out insane. I don’t just mean Templar conspiracy obsessive insane (although there is a guy who has a sign about the Masonic influence on the dollar bill). I mean ranting and raving, bark at the moon crazy. That, and a lot of people selling stuff like henna tatoos, crystals, and incense.

After all my fun there, it was time to head back to LAX. It’s hard getting used to all of the dead time you waste sitting in traffic in LA.

One final thought:

I think that smoking pot, if it doesn’t flat out make people stupid, certainly doesn’t make them any more intelligent or creative. I’ve now got some anecdotal evidence to back up my claim. As I’m waiting to get off the plane, some early-twenties hammer-head is loudly telling everyone how he’s en route to Vancouver, because he’s going to smoke put there. In addition to trotting out all kinds of ghetto and Jamaican slang for marajuana (pretty funny coming from one of the most white bread kids I’ve ever seen), he felt obliged to tell the entire airplane that “they’ve got the only rainforest in North America, so you can walk around the forest stoned.” That’s a great goal!

Anyway, here’s the kicker. Because he’s such a member of the cognoscenti, eager to impress the deplaning passengers with his inside knowledge of the drug subculture, he starts spouting off about how he’s going to “Vamsterdam, Vamsterdam! Because it’s got everything that Amsterdam has, but it’s not in Denmark.”

Frigging moron.

Final final note: the entry title, “Nostalgia on the 405,” is an intentional borrowing of Charles Mingus’s
Nostalgia in Times Square.” The freeways are probably the closest thing to public space that LA has, and might be the place, outside of home and work, where most Angelenos spend most of their time. Seriously.

View from the online gaming summit

I was part of the Los Angeles summit on online gaming regulation. It was great to meet David Carruthers and learn first-hand about what’s happening in this arena. When it came my turn to speak, I began a long and probably boring oration on the history of federal legislation on gaming, the Wire Act, gaming and technology, and the seemingly inevitableness (not a word, I know) of the regulation (and taxation) of Internet gaming.

This shows how getting your Ph.D. in history is not such a bad thing. Because I am a professional historian who studies gambling, I am able to marshal a dizzying array of facts and anecdotes to prove my point about the need to seriously examine the regulation of online gaming.

Speaking of which, I am chairing a session at G2E on the status of the Wire Act. Jay Cohen, the only American to serve jail time for violating the Wire Act for online gaming, will make his first public appearance since his release from prison. To arrange media coverage, email me.

Back to the LA summit. I’m going to post thoughts on my travels around LA after this post. I felt the summit was a great thing, with some very interesting people involved. I hope to do more of this stuff. The summit was one of four–I’ve already talked about the New York and DC events. The third was in Chicago.

Here’s the story about the Chicago summit:

Yesterday in Chicago, a panel of experts
met to discuss Internet gambling and outline ways to regulate this
increasingly popular form of entertainment. Hosted by BETonSPORTS plc,
operator of the world’s largest online wagering service, the summit was part
of a national public policy initiative called “Proposition 1: To Regulate or
Prohibit Online Gambling.” Intended to initiate local dialogue on the issue of
online gambling and create a structure for lawmakers to regulate the industry,
yesterday’s summit was the third in a series of meetings to be held across the
U.S. this month.
Yesterday’s discussion brought together experts in law, industry and media
to discuss the issue’s local, national and global significance. The state of
Illinois is unique in its gambling policy — it is one of only five states to
specifically prohibit Internet gambling, yet Illinois does permit a limited
number of riverboat casinos. In the face of two bills in Congress, one of
which calls for the prohibition of online gambling, and an investigation into
the industry by the Department of Justice, the panel examined the issues
surrounding regulation versus prohibition of the online gaming industry.
The panel’s consensus was that regulation would boost the economy by
providing tax revenues and adding jobs. It would also force transparency that
would legitimize the industry and enable consumer protections, such as
enforcing age requirements and providing assistance to problem gamblers. The
U.K. has successfully used this model since 1963.
Panel member Lawrence G. Walters, first amendment attorney and partner
with the national law firm of Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
( http://www.GameAttorneys.com ), has represented clients involved with all
aspects of the online gambling industry and has developed an international
reputation on Internet law issues.
“Prohibiting online gambling is not a reasonable solution for the mere
reason that the technology isn’t going anywhere,” said Walters. “With the
rapid rise of Internet activity nationwide, the government will eventually
have to face the fact that prohibiting this form of entertainment will only
have negative effects and will encourage the behavior they are trying to
curtail.”
David Carruthers, CEO of BETonSPORTS plc, stated, “Millions of consumers
in the U.S. gamble online, and we want to set the stage for hosting a safe
Internet site with sensible regulation benefiting not only the consumer but
the government. Online gambling allows the government the opportunity to
capitalize on revenues upwards of $100 billion, which is the amount Americans
bet on sports every year on the street and on college campuses.”
Kevin Smith, staff writer for Interactive Gaming News, added, “There is a
need to introduce new legislation to ensure responsible practices on the part
of the industry and online gamblers. It’s doubtful that current bills to
regulate online gambling will pass.”

Online Gambling Regulation to Boost Economy

I will post the release on Friday’s LA summit when I get it emailed to me or find it online.

Wanna be on TV?

Check this out from ABC News:


Is your child gambling more often after watching poker games on television? Do you approve of it as an innocent pastime, or are you concerned it’s becoming a dangerous habit?

For an upcoming story, ABCNEWS.com is looking for families to talk about the growing trend of poker-playing among teens and younger children.
ABCNEWS.com : Is TV Poker Increasing Teen Gambling?

Click the link to go to the form that lets you send “your story.” I am going to ask ABC news if the Gaming Studies Research Center can have the raw results of the survey.

I’m also interested in getting copies of last week’s ESPN series on gambling and sports. I saw that Larry Grossman of You Can Bet on It was a featured expert. It’s great to see people who actually know what they are talking about get on TV.