First thoughts on Palazzo

I stopped by Palazzo today and thought I’d share my impressions. Here are a few disorganized thoughts, without even the dignity of ellipses….

It’s a VERY soft opening, with incomplete finishes in the casino area and very little open. It’s neat seeing the casino as a work in progress, but if I was a paying customer I’d probably want to check in to the finished product.

Walking through the empty valet area and into the porte cochere felt strangely like walking on a dry river bed. You can tell that the driveway is meant to be filled with cars, and without them you feel a strange emptiness.

Inside the porte, and WOW. The atrium is majestic without being pompous. I wasn’t sure that they could pull off a Venetian theme in the post-literal theme era, but they’ve done it. I really like what they did here. Neat central statue thing that looks like three women ascending to heaven on a Tron light beam.

The marble floors have that cubical Venetian pattern that unfortunately reminds me of Q-Bert. I just want to hop around and avoid nasty bouncy things. Actually, it’s wait by an elevator disc and lure the nasty bouncy things to their death. If you don’t get that, you never played the game. And that’s probably not a huge loss.

Four paragraphs in, and I’ve abandoned casino design for a rambling commentary on an obscure Pacman knockoff. Maybe I’m getting a little burned out with the casino pundit thing. And for more 80s geek stuff.

The pay phones have complementary pads of paper and pens nearby. Pay phones? In 2008? Seriously, those can’t get much use.

Took a few quick pictures of the carpet–neat, but nothing breathtaking. Look for an update this week once I format them.

I can’t say anything about the rest of the property, because I didn’t see much, but the casino itself doesn’t seem that interesting. It’s supposed to be 105,000 square feet, but looks much smaller for some reason. You’ve got clear sight lines from one side to another, and a raised lounge that you can see everything from. I guess they didn’t talk to Bill Friedman, or they just don’t want to dominate the competition. The ceilings aren’t particularly high, but you definitely think “slot barn” on walking in.

Speaking of slots, slot bases still have areas for drop boxes, with locks on them. Is Las Vegas still that far behind the Borgata’s box-less slot bases? Or is a return to coin-based slot gaming in the cards?

Zebra-skinned, unnamed bar/lounge area in the back looks pretty retro. I like it.

Some kind of upscale wallet kiosk on the casino floor itself. Look for more integration like this is the future.

Still no Harry’s Bar here, or in the Venetian. Why not?

All in all, it’s taken the core elements of the Venetian theme, upped the level of finish, and produced something that is contemporary but clearly related to the more Old World-style Venetian. As the property is finished over the next few months it might not be the best place to stay, but once they stop construction it should be one of the Strip’s leading properties. I’d give it an A for execution, B- for imagination. Remember, this is without having seen the interiors of any of the restaurants, theaters, or guest rooms–just the casino and the public spaces that were open as of 12/31/07.

Antigua to get $21m from US

I haven’t posted in a very long time, but I wrote a draft of this a few days ago. It’s not breaking news now, but it’s still significant. From PC Mag:

Antigua and Barbuda won compensation from the United States on Friday in a long-running trade dispute about gambling, but the amount was far lower than the tiny Caribbean nation had been seeking.

A World Trade Organization WTO arbitration panel granted Antigua’s request to levy trade sanctions on U.S. intellectual property, for instance by lifting copyright on films and music to sell it themselves, prompting concern from Washington.

The WTO panel said Antigua was entitled to compensation of $21 million a year from the United States for being shut out of the U.S. online gambling market.

The ruling is only partial consolation for the former British colony, which built up an Internet gambling industry to replace declining tourism revenues, only to find itself shut out of the worlds biggest gambling market.

The award falls far short of what Antigua had demanded—$3.44 billion in “cross-retaliation”, allowing it to seek damages outside the original services sector. Washington had argued Antigua was entitled to only $500,000 in compensation.
Antigua Triumphs in U.S. Gambling Case – News and Analysis by PC Magazine

Twenty-one million isn’t so much. It’s not exactly the $3 USFL verdict, but this is hardly the sweeping victory Antigua was looking for. As has been the case, though, the saga will continue.

Trop woes continue

Like many a would-be empire-builder, Columbia Sussex met with a serious reverse on its Eastern Front. Having lost its license in New Jersey, the company now has to sell off 3 casinos, and even then might not be in the clear. From the Philly Inquirer:

Add Philadelphia; Baton Rouge, La.; and Las Vegas to the list of places where Columbia-Sussex Corp. – which lost its license to operate the Tropicana Casino & Resort in Atlantic City last week – faces issues ranging from health-code violations to the possible loss of other gaming licenses.

Its casino licenses in Indiana, Louisiana and Nevada appear in jeopardy, while labor demonstrations have been ongoing at its hotel in Baltimore and Tropicana casino in Las Vegas, where members of two unions have been working without a contract for months.

Yesterday, the company – based in Fort Mitchell, Ky. – said it would sell its casinos in Vicksburg, Miss., and Evansville, Ind., to raise money to pay off lenders. The company is also in the midst of trying to find a buyer for the Tropicana in Atlantic City.

In addition, the company faces health-code violations at one of its Philadelphia properties, the Sheraton Philadelphia City Center. City officials said that while the violations found in one of the hotel’s kitchens were officially deemed “critical,” they were not unusual for a large commercial kitchen. Unsanitary conditions at the Atlantic City Tropicana were a factor in the loss of its New Jersey gaming license.

The company announced a plan yesterday to sell some of its properties to pay down debt.

“In short order, we have developed a plan to address challenges by selling our properties in Atlantic City, Evansville and Vicksburg in an orderly manner,” the company said. Cash from the sales will help it pay off some senior debt, according to William J. Yung III, chief executive officer and president of Tropicana Entertainment, the gambling subsidiary of Columbia-Sussex.

The company said last week that it might seek bankruptcy protection if it were unsuccessful in appealing the licensing decision of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission.

Tropicana’s other problems | Philadelphia Inquirer | 12/18/2007

I’m seeing some parallels to Napoleon’s invasion of Russia here–after retreating from the burned-out remnants of Moscow, his army was never the same. Similarly, Columbia-Sussex met defeat at the Trop AC after “winning the battle” by successfully acquiring the property, and is now on a long forced march back, selling off properties just to stay afloat, dogged by accusations of all sorts, and flirting with bankruptcy.

As an Atlantic City native, I feel perverse pride in the fact that my hometown helped to bring down what had been a prosperous, expanding company.

Bet pressing demonstrated

If you’ve ever wondered what “pressing a bet” is, thanks to the magic of YouTube, you can see it for yourself:


Link if you can’t view the embed:YouTube – Casino Scam #3
One comment: it looks like the guy demonstrating the move drops a black ($100) on top of a pile of green ($25) chips. I hope he’s just doing that for the camera, because in most jurisdictions you have to place your highest-value chips at the bottom of the stack, to prevent precisely this.

Past AC license denials

In yesterday’s article on the Tropicana license denial, the Press of Pleasantville (I saw that in one of the comments and couldn’t resist) ran a sidebar on past license bids that fizzled. Here it is:

1979
- The Casino Control Commission orders the chairman and vice chairman of the Caesars World board, Clifford and Stuart Perlman, to sever their relationship with the company because of their business dealings with alleged organized-crime associates.

- The commission denies a license to Bally Manufacturing Corp. board Chairman William T. O’Donnell because of his business dealings with an alleged organized-crime figure.

1982
The commission denies a permanent license to Hugh Hefner and his Playboy Enterprises Inc., which had opened the Playboy Casino & Hotel the year before, because it felt Hefner had lied on the witness stand. Two months later, the casino hotel becomes Elsinore’s Atlantis.

1985
- The commission denies a casino license to Barron Hilton and his Hilton Hotels Corp. due to questions about some of its executives and ties to a Chicago attorney whose activities suggested a possible link to organized crime. The company sells its marina casino to Donald Trump for $320 million.

1989
- The Atlantis closes after the Casino Control Commission rules that it is no longer financially stable. Donald Trump buys the property for $63 million and operates it as the Trump Regency, a noncasino hotel.
Atlantic City’s Tropicana fears bankruptcy from license denial

Good news for Bill Yung: Clifford Perlman was denied a license in New Jersey and was inducted into the Gaming Hall of Fame this year. So maybe Yung will be in the class of 2022.

Here’s the progression of license denials:
Mob/Mob/Perjury/Mob/Financial instability/Non-first-classedness
It looks like the original focus of regulation and licensing–to keep the mob out–has drifted a bit.

Vegas winter travel advisory

I’m not going to pile on the Tropicana AC story today. They got their license ripped, and I’ve said all I’m going to say about it on this thread at 2 Way Hard 3 and to several journalists who’ve called me just to chat about this today.

Instead, I’m going to provide a public service: a winter-weather travel advisory for Las Vegas. I’m spurred to do this after watching too many people head out into passenger pickup at McCarran saying, “Golly, it’s cold here. I thought Vegas was supposed to be in a desert.”

The thing is, deserts aren’t just hot places–they are dry places that can be temperate, hot, or cold. There’s a big part of Antarctica that’s a desert, and I’m sure research scientists don’t fly down there wearing t-shirts and shorts.

Vegas tends to get pretty cold in the winter (roughly December-February), relative at least to Southern California. I know there are lots of folks from the Upper Peninsula, Wisconsin, and Saskatchewan who will say that even in the middle of December, Vegas temperatures are balmy. That’s true, and winter in Edmonton is pretty toasty to someone who’s used to the far side of Pluto. If you’ve acclimated to dressing for 115-degree summers, 40-degree winters feel cold.

So when you come to Vegas in the winter months, be prepared to be chilly. The temperature ranges from mid to upper 30s at night to mid-50s during the day. You’re probably not going to go to the pool, unless it’s indoors. You should definitely bring a jacket if you’re planning on walking around at night.

This is particularly true for New Year’s. If you’re planning to be outside for the big to-do, dress warmly. Whatever wind there is gets amplified by the high-rises, so it can feel quite gusty. I spent a total of 6 hours at one of the outdoor KLAS locations last New Year’s, and it was really, really cold. Girls: don’t plan on wearing a slinky, strappy dress while promenading around the Strip–you will regret it. Bring a stylish coat–I recommend something mid-calf length, which should be both practical and fashionable. Remember that all of the clubs at the casinos have coat checks, so don’t feel like you’ll have to carry it around all night. Guys, bring a coat, and maybe two, so you can give one to your date (or someone else’s date) who hasn’t brought her own.

I felt like I had to post this after I got back from running yesterday morning. The usual puddles that I dodge were actually frozen, and there was frost over all of the cars. When I got back, the Weather Channel said it was 35 degrees, though I suspect my neighborhood was a little chillier. December’s a great month to come to Vegas, mostly because you can get great room deals, but come prepared.

Barden profile in NYT

You don’t read too much about casino owner Don Barden in the Las Vegas or gambling media, but he’s got a nice-sized casino company and great prospects for the future, particularly in Pittsburgh. The NY Times has a short piece detailing his rise to wealth and moderate fame:

Don H. Barden could have scheduled the groundbreaking for his $450 million casino on his 64th birthday, Dec. 20, if he wanted. After all, he owns what is projected to be the most lucrative of Pennsylvania’s 14 slots casino licenses.

But already irritated by a year’s worth of delays, Mr. Barden, the country’s only African-American owner of a national gambling company, decided against that.

“I didn’t want to lose two weeks of the good weather” for construction, he said before the ceremony on Tuesday along the banks of the Ohio River, where his Majestic Star casino will rise.

It was a landmark day for Mr. Barden, a soft-spoken, sometimes prickly Horatio Alger figure who grew up poor with 12 siblings in the Detroit suburb of Inkster, the son of auto workers and the great-grandson of a freed slave. The new casino is projected to nearly double his Detroit company’s annual revenue, pushing it over $1 billion.

“This is a great day for our company, and this is a great day for me,” Mr. Barden told a cheering crowd of about 300 local officials, friends and family.

For Casino Owner, Winning a License Was Not a Matter of Luck – New York Times

As you’ll see when you click through, Barden says that by doing his homework and picking an optimal casino site, he virtually guaranteed himself a license in Pittsburgh. It’s a smart approach. When it’s a city-wide monopoly, siting becomes one of the crucial parts of any bid.

Caesars raises limits

I’m not totally sure that this is news, but I’m going with it today anyway–otherwise, I’d have to post my usual thoughts on the lower AC revenue numbers. Caesars Palace has raised its table limits to what it says are the highest in town (but which may not in fact be). From the LVRJ:

The granddaddy casino of high-limit gambling on the Strip is doing some Old Vegas-style marketing to get its name into the ears of the new breed of big-money gamblers.

On Monday, Caesars Palace raised its blackjack and line bets at craps to $50,000 per hand, which it is touting as the highest posted limits in town.

“It’s kind of like what the Horseshoe did in the old days when they’d hang the sign over the craps table claiming the highest limits anywhere,” long-time casino observer Phil Hevener said. “It’s certainly going to attract some notice. The push in competition for high-end table game business is pretty fierce at this point.”

The venerable casino has been increasingly sharing much of its high-limit play with Wynn Las Vegas, The Venetian and Bellagio, said Gary Selesner, president of Caesars Palace.
aesars executives believe the new limits could bring back some of the high-end players the property “hadn’t seen in a while.”

“Caesars Palace has historically had among the highest limits in Las Vegas,” Selesner said. “Now we can claim the highest limits in Las Vegas. This is an opportunity to put Caesars Palace back as a leader in this part of the market.”

The betting limits for blackjack is up from $10,000 per hand. Players will also have the option to bet three hands at $25,000 per hand.

In addition to the $50,000 line bets, craps players can bet $25,000 and $30,000 on place bets, up from $5,000 and $6,000. “Hard way” players can now wager $10,000.

Caesars also raised the betting limits on roulette, going from $500 to $3,000 for “any way” wagers, including single numbers, splits and quads.

State gaming regulators were notified of the increases, but the change does not require regulatory approval.
ReviewJournal.com – Business – CAESARS AIMING HIGHER

Alan Feldman of MGM Mirage raised an interesting point later in the article–one that I mentioned to the reporter in our conversation: that many casinos offer higher limits to marker players on a case-by-case basis anyway. So while the “posted limits” at Caesars may indeed be the highest in town, I doubt that a major player with a credit line at the Bellagio would be told to take his action elsewhere if he wanted to play blackjack for $60,000 a hand over a set period.

In short, it’s a gimmick, but it’s a good gimmick. 99% of the players out there wouldn’t be able to bet the minimums at the tables with higher limits. But I think it enhances the average gambler’s experience to know that, somewhere in the casino, someone is betting more than they make in a year on a single hand of baccarat. Caesars has some great amenities–the Forum Shops and the Colosseum are two that stand out–but it’s a very competitive market, and I think that this is a good move. At the very least, it got the RJ to run a story touting the property’s high end play, so it’s already paying for itself.

Speaking of the money aspect, I hope that the soon-to-be private equity owners of Harrah’s have read a good primer on volatility in the casino environment, because this kind of high-end play can lead to big wins but also big losses for the casino over the short haul.

Customer complaints, the old-fashioned way

Like most of you, I spent some time this morning browsing through the Mahabharata looking for material for a class. And I was struck by the courtly fashion in which hospitality-related customer complaints were resolved back in Vedic times:

And the king having signified his assent, entertained Utanka duly. And Utanka seeing that the food placed before him had hair in it, and also that it was cold, thought it unclean. And he said unto Paushya, ‘Thou givest me food that is unclean, therefore shalt thou lose thy sight.’ And Paushya in answer said, ‘And because dost thou impute uncleanliness to food that is clean, therefore shalt thou be without issue.’ And Utanka thereupon rejoined, ‘It behoveth thee not, after having offered me unclean food, to curse me in return. Satisfy thyself by ocular proof.’

“And Paushya seeing the food alleged to be unclean satisfied himself of its uncleanliness. And Paushya having ascertained that the food was truly unclean, being cold and mixed with hair, prepared as it was by a woman with unbraided hair, began to pacify the Rishi Utanka, saying, ‘Sir, the food placed before thee is cold, and doth contain hair, having been prepared without sufficient care. Therefore I pray thee pardon me. Let me not become blind.’ And Utanka answered, ‘What I say must come to pass. Having become blind, thou mayst, however, recover the sight before long. Grant that thy curse also doth not take effect on me.’ And Paushya said unto him, ‘I am unable to revoke my curse. For my wrath even now hath not been appeased. But thou knowest not this. For a Brahmana’s heart is soft as new-churned butter, even though his words bear a sharp-edged razor. It is otherwise in respect of these with the Kshatriya. His words are soft as new-churned butter, but his heart is like a sharp-edged tool, such being the case, I am unable, because of the hardness of my heart, to neutralise my curse. Then go thou thy own way.’ To this Utanka made answer, “I showed thee the uncleanliness of the food offered to me, and I was even now pacified by thee. Besides, saidst thou at first that because I imputed uncleanliness to food that was clean I should be without issue. But the food truly unclean, thy curse cannot affect me. Of this I am sure.’ And Utanka having said this departed with the ear-rings.
The Mahabharata, Book 1: Adi Parva: Paushya Parva: Section III

I think that the Tropicana AC relicensing might have gone a little better if they’d have handled all their customer complaints through ritualistic curses instead of referral to the risk management department, or whatever they did.

New slot scam, and a whacky estimate of casino theft

There’s always an arms race of sorts going on between slot cheats and casino security. The cheats figure out a way to rip off the machine, the security folks learn how to detect and prevent it, so the cheats come up with a new scam. Ad infinitum. Now, surprise surprise, comes news that ticket-in/ticket-out machines–which don’t have coins to steal–are nevertheless susceptible to cheating from the inside. Here’s the whole story from the LV Sun:

High-tech thieves have discovered a new way to rip off slot machines – stealing more than $1 million from the Orleans before management shut down their computer-assisted heist.

Gaming regulators say the crime – one of the largest in years – shows a vulnerability in casino security that could lead to new surveillance standards.

The theft began in September 2006 and allegedly involved three slot workers who, over several months, manipulated software that prints slot machine payout tickets. They allegedly worked with two accomplices who posed as customers and cashed the tickets.
….
The Gaming Control Board’s enforcement chief says the Orleans incident was a new one to him, although it had a familiar ring to security experts.

In this case, Orleans workers printed winning tickets on test machines in a back room, using software allowing the machines to mimic machines on the slot floor that had been turned off, investigators told the Sun. The tickets were for relatively small amounts – a few hundred dollars each – to escape the notice of casino bosses.
Las Vegas SUN: THIEVES INSIDE THE MACHINE

Later in the article, a security expert estimated that casinos lose about 6 percent of their revenue to inside theft each year. Since according to my calculations big Strip casinos make about $700,000 a day on average (some days are bigger than others), that’s a total of $42,000 a day going out the back door.

That figure is frankly unbelievable. I can’t imagine that, in a business where it’s common to nickel-and-dime employees over salary (any dual-rates out there?), it would be the industry standard to sit back and tolerate losses of $15.3 MILLION a year. I want to see some proof of that 6 percent figure before I take it seriously.

Think about it. How many employees have access to cash on the casino floor? A few hundred? To get up to these numbers, 42 of them would have to be taking $1000 a day home with them, every day, without anyone noticing. I could accept a cashier here or there stuffing a $20 into their pockets while no one was looking, or a dealer paying a friend’s push once or twice a night with no one noticing. I wouldn’t be too surprised at a total of $500 to $1000 a day, at most, disappearing.

But if casinos regularly fail to account for 6 percent of their revenue, that is some serious tax evasion. Think of it–that’s $15.3 million for every casino on the Strip not being taxed. In the old days they called that skimming, and this is why casinos have something called Minimum Internal Control Standards. The state would never tolerate that. By sheer dollar amount, this is far more than was skimmed from casinos during the glory days back in the 1950s and 1960s. Heading into a fiscal crunch, it is frankly unbelievable that the state would countenance that kind of sloppy control.

The more I think about it, I’m officially calling “bullshit” on that six percent figure, until I see some kind of proof. It just doesn’t make sense that casinos would spend millions of dollars on player tracking to avoid giving out too many buffet passes while happily letting $42,000 disappear each day.