Book Review: Dirt is Good for You

Editors of Babble.com. Dirt is Good for You: True Stories of Surviving Parenthood. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2009. 256 pages.

This book is intended for “urban, hipster” parents, which I’ve concluded is code for “since we pay $2500 a month for a 4th floor 800 square-foot walkup, we think we’re better than people who live in ranch homes and shop at Walmart.” Although the essays are by different authors, the tone is remarkably similar throughout—the unbearable smugness just won’t let up. Imagine the kids from high school who thought they were the coolest because they claimed to like bands that no one else had ever heard of. Okay, now imagine those kids raising kids, and telling you that since what they do goes “against the grain,” it’s totally hip. Annoying doesn’t even begin to cover it.

Generically, each essay says about the same thing: I’m a bad parent because I do x, but I’m not really a bad parent because it’s actually a good idea to breast-feed a 17-month old, demand a present from your husband just for giving birth, not use a baby monitor, warm your sons clothes in the dryer before they get dressed in the morning; not buy your kids toys; give your kid a pacifier; despise other new moms; yell at your kids; overspend on birthday parties; ad nauseum. I’m pretty sure every parent has had a moment that wouldn’t land them on the cover of Parenting magazine; it’s just that most of us don’t turn these mis-steps into virtues.

There’s an underlying tone of, “Wow, how cool, we are the first people to ever raise kids!” which is completely nonsensical, given that homo sapiens goes back about 200,000 years, and “urban” life at least 10,000. Being the first generation of parents who can pause and rewind live TV doesn’t make you any more special than being the first parents to use draft animals or gas lamps. Get back to me when you’re really pioneering by raising kids in zero-g or on the moon.

I actually like one of the nearly-fifty essays in the book: Madeline Holler’s reflections on being the parent of a “below average” child, which breaks through the usual hipster self-defense to offer the reader some of her vulnerability and uncertainty. The collection could have used more of that, and less of the approach Steven Johnson uses in “Street Walkers,” in which he gushes about how “children strengthen the connective tissue of urban streets” in ways that are doubtless inconceivable to parents doomed to live in rural, small town, or suburban America. News flash: people always talk more to people with children, probably because they think they’ve got something in common with them and they’re less likely to try to mug them. Walking around with a child is a marker saying that at least one person finds you tolerable enough to have sex with, and trustworthy enough to take care of his/her offspring. This isn’t an urban phenomenon.

Another writer concludes that it’s okay to take your kids to McDonald’s because the frou-frou coffee houses she went to before she had kids aren’t baby-friendly. That’s the problem with the entire collection right there: it’s based on extremes, with no middle ground. You either go to some sustainable, fair trade art gallery/independent coffee house, or you get in line for a Happy Meal. In fact, there are plenty of small restaurants who welcome children because they’re mom and pop places…and mom and pop usually have some empathy for other moms and pops, particularly those who are regular customers and good tippers. The whole essay is based on a flawed premise that the writer can’t see because she’s too busy trying to be unconventional.

In other words, this is a pretty bad book, at least by the standards of this non-Manhattanite parent. Outside of Holler, the writers just don’t take enough risks: they are too pre-occupied with trying to be cool. And if there’s one thing that kills memoirish writing for me, it’s an author who always has to be the hero of the piece. If you are writing about yourself, you can’t be the coolest person in the essay; it just rings false, like the entire piece is an exercise in self-gratification.

I honestly don’t like giving negative reviews, but this book was so awful that I can’t in good conscience recommend that anyone buy it. Maybe you have to be an urban hipster to get it, but I don’t.

Roll the Bones in Polish

It’s a happy day in my writing career. The Polish translation of Roll the Bones: The History of Gambling is out at last. For those of you who speak Polish, here’s the first bit of the prologue:

Jak feniks z popiołów

Był 5 czerwca 1637 r. Purytańscy osadnicy, przybyli niedawno ze starego kontynentu, posuwali się naprzód zajmując coraz to nowe tereny, zaś dla Indian z plemienia Pequot (Pekoci), z doliny rzeki Connecticut, oznaczało to koniec świata.

Słowo pequot w języku algonkińskim znaczy „niszczyciel” i tylko podkreśla reputację tego plemienia. Wieki temu Pekoci i Mohikanie wyemigrowali razem z doliny rzeki Hudson i udali się do Connecticut, po czym rozdzielili się na dwa wrogie sobie plemiona. Pekoci zajmowali się wyłącznie walką z Mohikanami i Narragansettami, bądź łupieniem okolicznych wiosek, których mieszkańcy drżeli na samą myśl o tym plemieniu i jego wodzu, Sassacusie. Kiedy jednak wielka migracja białych, mówiących po angielsku kolonistów rozlała się po równinach wzdłuż Zatoki Massachusetts, zagrażając dominacji Pekotów, konfrontacja stała się nieunikniona.

Zaczęły nasilać się akty przemocy: porwania, napady i rozboje, co prowadziło do otwartej wojny między Anglikami a Pekotami. Jeszcze kilkanaście lat wcześniej biali przybysze na swoje pierwsze Święto Dziękczynienia zaprosili swoich sąsiadów, Indian, by wspólnie z nimi zajadać się pieczystym z dzikiego indyka i innej upolowanej zwierzyny. Teraz stara przyjaźń ustąpiła miejsca ekspansji, zaś angielska broń palna miała okazję zmierzyć się z legendarnym okrucieństwem Pekotów.

Historia Hazardu – książka.

It is my first written work to be translated into any language, which I guess means something. In any event, if you’ve been wanting to get a copy of Roll the Bones for a friend but their lack of English reading skills has been a problem, you are now in luck–if they can read Polish.

Good running news

Here’s some good news about the Rock and Roll Las Vegas Marathon from the LVRJ:

In the 10-plus months since it was announced that Competitor Group was taking over the Las Vegas Marathon, there have been several new additions to the race

A new name — the Rock 'n' Roll Las Vegas Marathon — that falls into line with the widely successful brand Competitor has spread around the country.

A new course that will include more of the Strip than ever, with the half-marathon contested almost entirely on Las Vegas Boulevard.

Now, nearly six weeks before the Dec. 6 race day, it’s clear the event will draw new numbers, as well. General manager Adam Zocks said registration topped the 20,000 mark last week.

“We have jumped right over the 20,000 plateau, and we’re probably pushing 21,000 right now,” Zocks said Tuesday afternoon. “Obviously, we’re very excited about the way things are progressing and about how many participants we’ll have on hand Dec. 6. I think we’ll have 25,000 when all is said and done.”

The previous event record was approximately 17,000 in 2007, when Devine Racing oversaw the event. Zocks was pleased to have overtaken that total, but he wasn’t surprised.

“No, not really. We’ve been on this type of pace most of the year, since we announced the event and the new course,” he said. “The one thing we definitely have in our favor is the Rock ‘n’ Roll brand. We have runners who follow the Rock ‘n’ Roll brand from one event to the next.

“We tell them we’re coming to Las Vegas, we’ve got a half-marathon course like no other, and the marathon course is unique, too. With the spectacle of Las Vegas, the draw is there.”

via Runners flocking to Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon – Sports – ReviewJournal.com.

I’m excited about running in the race this year. Well, I’m always excited, but this year feels different already. The marathon has been pretty bare bones for the past few years, and with the new owners I’m sure that the runners will have plenty of fun stuff to do in addition to running 13.1 or 26.2 miles.

If you want to register for the race or look into volunteering, check out the official race website.

UNLV Gaming Podcast 15 (Roger Gros) is up

After about a week’s delay I’ve finally gotten the 15th UNLV Gaming Podcast up, featuring Global Gaming Business publisher Roger Gros. It wasn’t easy–midway through Roger’s Gaming Research Colloquium talk, my recording device cut out. Luckily, I was able to sit down with Roger and ask him a few questions that reproduced, with a few great additions, the last part of his talk and the q&a.

15-October 26, 2009
Roger Gros (Global Gaming Business)
Mr. Gros talks about his days as a dealer in Atlantic City, unionization efforts there, his early work on Casino Journal, the founding of the Global Gaming Expo and Global Gaming Business, and much more.

In a strange way I’m glad I got to sit down and “redo” the podcast, because we covered some very interesting territory. This is really good stuff, particularly for those of you who like to follow the gaming business–Roger has a great inside perspective. If you don’t already, you should add GGBnews.com to your list of check-em-daily gaming news sites.

For more info, visit the podcast page or check it out in iTunes.

More death spiral talk in AC

This is a well-written NY Times article about where Atlantic City is today, even if it’s the same song we’ve been hearing for decades now:

Just a few years ago, Atlantic City was boomtown U.S.A. Day-tripping retirees plunked quarter after quarter into slot machines at the casino warehouses lining the Boardwalk. The city was in the midst of a huge building expansion as casinos invested billions of dollars to build new hotel towers and to dress up fading interiors. Plans for a handful of megacasinos were on the drawing board, promising to bring lots of Las Vegas-style sex and sizzle to this seaside resort.Today, Atlantic City, in the eyes of one gambling executive, Tim Wilmott, is in a “death spiral.”Rows of slot machines stand eerily empty. Over the summer, the Tropicana was sold in bankruptcy court; another 3 of the town’s 11 casinos are currently under bankruptcy protection. The lender for yet another, Resorts International, is in talks to take it over and could by year-end. Resorts was the first casino outside of Las Vegas to offer legal gambling, in 1978.Many of the rooms stuffed inside luxurious towers built during the high times are empty during the week. And plans for a majority of the megacasinos have been shelved. Only one, the Revel, is under construction — and many question whether its developers will be able to raise enough money to finish the project.The economic slowdown has shown that the gambling industry is not quite as recession-proof as was so long believed. Gambling on the Las Vegas Strip is falling on a par with Atlantic City, and many other gambling locales nationwide are also hurting. But Atlantic City’s challenges may be greater than those faced elsewhere. A second blow — and one that most of the local casino operators here underestimated — is coming from gambling operations that opened in recent years in nearby states.

via Can Atlantic City Raise the Stakes and Move Beyond Gambling? – NYTimes.com.

You’ve got to understand that I’ve been hearing this same debate (“Atlantic City is dying…no, it’s just around the corner from greatness”) all of my life, so I’m a little jaded. The city has always been just this close to turning it around, or dropping off the face of the earth.

I think I’ve weighed in on Wilmott’s provision before, but I’ll repeat myself: this guy wasn’t talking death spiral when he was trying to finagle the entire Bader Field site from the city or buy the bus lot on Route 30 and have the zoning changed so he could build a casino there. When Penn National actually stops kicking the tires and buys something on the Strip, maybe the company will have a little more relevance.

So is the city doomed or on the verge of a golden age of prosperity? I’d guess that it’ll continue scuffling along as it has been for the last 30 years, with a little less reliance on day-trippers.

Me @G2E

I’m still not where I want to be with the book review I’m working on, but here’s something I can share. I’m going to be moderating a panel at G2E about F&B as a marketing tool. Here is the info:

Thursday, November 19, 2009: 9:15 AM – 10:15 AM
Role: PANEL MODERATOR
Creating Identity: Using F&B as a Marketing Tool
The modern food and beverage portfolio creates more than just a tool to feed your hungry guests.
Learn why F&B directors should work closely with casino operations executives to maximize
everyone’s revenue potential. Experts will reveal effective ways to strategically couple your product
offerings. Whether it is innovative comp programs, unique marketing opportunities, or creating
casino F&B events featuring celebrity chef book signings or VIP dinners, a well-aligned F&B
strategy will be a value-added proposition for the casino.

If you’ve got questions you think I should ask the experts, email me or add them to the comments.

I’m guessing the audience will be mostly f&b directors, with a few other executives attending as well.

Net gambling rundown

This piece in the LA Times mentions the current pressure to legalize some forms of Internet gambling, with a hint of the real story:

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) have both introduced bills in Congress to lift a federal ban on much online play and clarify the law, which is even murkier than it is for physical casinos, if that's possible. Their goals include taking a piece of the action for the U.S. Treasury, on the political principle that sins always seem less deadly when there's money to be squeezed from them. The consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers estimated in 2007 that legalization could yield as much as $43 billion in tax revenue over 10 years if it includes sports betting, $34 billion even if it doesn't.

Another impetus is that new Federal Reserve and Treasury Department rules requiring banks and other financial institutions to block gambling transfers will go into effect Dec. 1, and the banks are screaming bloody murder about the added regulatory burden.

Internet gambling is one of those issues that shines a light on the distribution of juice in Washington.

The repeal bills delight casino companies such as Harrah’s Entertainment, which is hankering to expand its thriving poker business online and has spent about $1 million this year alone to lobby Congress for legalization. But they also leave intact a ban on Internet sports betting, which pleases outfits like the National Football League, no slouch in the Washington lobbying game.

via Calling America’s bluff on Internet gambling — latimes.com.

Here are few things to think about. I’ve read a lot about what Harrah’s thinks, what the Poker Players Alliance thinks, and what the NFL thinks. How about what the American people think? If you allow people to gamble online in one form, is there really any logical reason not to let them bet on anything they want? It’s like saying you can buy books but not DVDs online.

Naturally, if a form of gambling is completely banned, like betting on dog-fighting, you wouldn’t be able to offer that. Outside of that restriction, I don’t see the legal or ethical rationale behind championing poker at the expense of sports betting.

In fact, the reason is right up there in the last paragraph that I quoted–there is big money behind poker, and not much against, and big money against sports betting. Again, the actual desires of the people don’t seem to come into play. This isn’t good, because either way you look at it a populace eager to gamble is being held hostage to special interests, or a pernicious new form of gambling is about to be foisted on an unwilling nation.

Book Review: Tap City

Ron Abell. Tap City. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1985. 274 pages.

This is hardly a new release, but I just read this book for a class I might be teaching about gambling and media. And it’s a book I should have read a long time ago.

Tap City is about a fictional Seven-Card Stud Tournament (definitely not the World Series of Poker) hosted by fictional celebrity poker player Stretch Jackson (definitely not Amarillo Slim) in a fictional Reno casino, the Taj Mahal. The first part of the book sets the scene, describing several of the eventual participants in the game at various points over the previous few months, and the second half is the telling of what happens during the three-day tournament.

Instead of setting the tournament in sweltering Las Vegas, where the unrelenting heat would be an apt metaphor for the growing pressure of the tournament, Abell sets his first (and to my knowledge, only) novel in Reno. In January. He’s a skilled enough writer that he makes the reader (or at least this reader) pine for Reno in January. If you’ve ever been in Reno in January, you know that’s quite a feat. His description is so pitch-perfect and unvarnished that the reader is absolutely drawn in.

Abell creates memorable characters, like Lee Sherman Tobias, an aging poker warrior who might be a synthesis of Johnny Moss and Nick Dandalos; William “the Owl Avery,” who seems to have a touch of a more academic Puggy Pearson; Vic Houston, who might be based on Doyle Brunson;and several characters based on no obvious real world counterparts, like the embittered former dealer Shayna, a cross-dressing down-on-his-luck actor named Jerry Corbett, Doug McGowan, cursed with beginner’s luck, and insecure body builder and real estate scammer Brian Bates.

But the characters (and indeed the action) take a back seat to Abell’s prose, which passably advances the story while setting up some of the greatest prose about gambling, poker, and Reno that I’ve read yet. The opening description of Stretch Jackson sets the tone. I’ll excerpt a few sentences that don’t do it justice:

He was called Stretch Jackson and his markers were honored from London to Las Vegas. He weighed a hundred and fifty-five pounds and would have stood six and a half feet tall if he ever straightened up, but he had a lazy man’s posture. He never stood if he could sit and he never sat if he could slouch. He had a hollow chest and no waist and when he walked he went slowly, like a man moving through water….He had good teeth and an easy smile and his blue-gray eyes were every bit as compassionate as a wolf’s.

Here’s some more:

Poker had almost nothing to do with cards. It has to do with people. (p.7)

She learned that the losers in Vegas weren’t beaten as much as they were pulverized. The mills of the casino grind slow, but they grind relentlessly. (p. 28)

That was Reno for you. It was a tank town compared to Vegas, but it had a heart sometimes. (p.48)

As a group, the players bore up under the weight of enough rings, wristwatches, cuff links, bracelets, pendants, and neckchains to founder a galleon (p. 61)

“Playing Vic Houston’s like trying to nail Jelly to the wall.” (p.112)

That’s just a small sampling. You’ve got to read the book to really appreciate Abell’s turn of a phrase–it’s remarkable.

But pretty language isn’t all that distinguishes Tap City. Through the device of the tournament, Abell distills, into a single event that must produce dozens of losers and one winner, all the drama of poker and gambling. There are real insights here into psychology–maybe stressed a bit too much by having a psychologist as an ancillary character, but interesting nonetheless. Tap City explores not just the dramatic nuts and bolts of poker playing–to raise or fold, bluff or check–but the soul behind the game, and by extension Reno.

It’s a shame that this is the only novel Abell published. I definitely would read more from him. As it is, Tap City has both literary and historic value. It’s funny to hear a character comment that next year, the World Series of Poker might have 200 players, and that it’s gotten far too big. The mid-1980s also saw the beginning of the changing of the poker guard, as the road gamblers started to fade away, supplanted by a new rank of champions.

In short, Abell’s novel is an engaging read (I got through it in just about one sitting) that also sheds light on the nature of gambling, the game of poker, and the city of Reno in a way that few other novels do. It’s a highly recommended read.

Morality, economics, and gambling expansion

I’ve got a new column in the LVBP, about the dubious morality (and even more dubious economics) of many states that legalize gambling:

There's a paradox here: Many states legalize gambling only to bring in revenue in lieu of raising taxes. When their citizens can't generate the kind of tax revenues state governments can't do without, gambling is the obvious fix. The only problem is, when people aren't spending on other things, they're not going to be gambling much, either.The whole model of legalizing for revenues and revenues alone is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : States that legalized gambling for revenue did so for the wrong reason.

Read the whole piece if you like. What I’m doing is carrying the typical argument that “this is a business like any other” to its logical conclusion. If it really is, then artificially limited the market does everyone except a select few a great disservice.

Of course, I’m not the first person to say this. Peter Collins said it with a great deal more wit in his Gambling and the Public Interest.

Casino crime on the rise

This is a very interesting story from the LV Sun:

Gaming board agents have made nearly 400 arrests in connection with casino and gambling-related crimes in Nevada this year, compared with fewer than 300 for all of 2008.Regulators can’t explain the uptick, especially given that law enforcement resources to combat theft haven’t increased amid budget cuts. It’s logical, then, to assume that the poor economy may be leading more people to steal, said Jerry Markling, the Gaming Control Board’s enforcement chief.Casino security consultant Willy Allison, who trains surveillance workers and founded the World Game Protection conference, says casinos nationwide have reported increased theft yet are frustrated in their efforts to catch criminals because of workforce cutbacks. Casino managers, Allison said, are increasingly concerned about their own workers, as low morale and ever-present cash make casinos ripe for employee theft.“You’ve got staff on the floor whose tips have dropped 40 percent, they’re having trouble paying their mortgages and they don’t know whether they’ll have a job tomorrow,” he said. “You have opportunity, motivation and rationalization. People who were honest before the recession aren’t now, now that their children are starving.”

via In down economy, crimes against casinos are up – Monday, Oct. 19, 2009 | 2 a.m. – Las Vegas Sun.

This is a perennial problem that’s only been exacerbated by the economic downturn. No matter what security measures casinos put in place, someone will test them, and maybe succeed, for a while.

Partially, these are crimes of opportunity, but the fact that these are casinos also contributes. Because there are thousands (even millions) of dollars changing hands each day on the casino floor, many criminals feel like “it’s not really stealing.” Casinos promote the idea that they are wild places where anything can happen. That’s true, and this is the downside: people cheating and stealing.

Some people think that there is a technological or procedural solution out there. I don’t think there is. Good surveillance is effective as a forensic tool and as a deterrent for many people, but others will just play the odds and assume that the eye in the sky is mid-blink when their hand is in the till. No matter what the breakthrough–better cameras, RFID chips, biometric software–people will still try to take things that aren’t theirs. The only answer is to continue to investigate suspicious activity and catch the offenders.

Until people have limitless resources, they will always have an incentive to cheat or steal. Some people, even if they had everything they wanted, would still try to do it just for the thrill, or out of spite. In other words, casino surveillance and security, even though it isn’t a “revenue-producing department,” is probably a growth field no matter what the economy is doing.