Book Review: Henry Clay

David S. Heidler and Jeanne T. Heidler. Henry Clay: The Essential American. New York: Random House, 2010. 624 pages.

Henry Clay was a giant of early American politics. As Speaker of the House, senator from Kentucky, secretary of state, and de facto leader of the Whig opposition to Andrew Jackson, his power often rivaled that of presidents. But today, though most Americans might acknowledge him as vaguely important, few know much about his actual accomplishments.

In this book, Heidler and Heidler provide a welcome correction to this trend with an exhaustive biography of Clay that might reintroduce him to a new generation. The Heidlers have drawn on a range of sources, including the work of other historians, contemporary news accounts, Clay’s speeches, and private correspondence. The result is a balanced portrait of Clay that does justice to a man full of contradictions, who owned slaves and advocated a protectionist tariff yet spoke as a champion of liberty.

The authors not only present the reader with a life of Clay; they reevaluate several ideas about Clay, such as the claim that, in 1841, he deliberately sabotaged John Tyler’s presidency in order to clear the field for his own run in 1844. The Heidlers suggest that this wasn’t true, and that Clay posthumously became the victim of an organized smear campaign orchestrated by political enemies with axes to grind. Points like this make the book an interesting, critical read; since the authors are actively evaluating the extant sources, the reader gets to do the same.

HENRY CLAY as comprehensive a book about Clay that the non-specialist is likely to want. While it is quite readable, it’s readable in the sense that a marathon is runnable: it’s good enough to keep you turning the pages, but with 624 of them, it’s a long haul. Those looking for a briefer introduction might find the going a bit tough, but there is a great deal of good writing–and powerful history–in these pages.

Cantor changes gambling

My latest Vegas Seven column is up, about Cantor Gaming’s eDeck:

Gambling has been evolving since our ancestors started filing down animal bones, eventually ending up with cubical ivory dice. The invention of block printing helped to popularize playing cards. In the 19th century, the telegraph led to the first remote gambling: off-track wagering on horse races. Slot machines have incorporated a variety of technological advances to increase their appeal.It continues to evolve as I type.By applying knowledge gained from securities trading to mobile technology, Cantor Gaming is changing the way people gamble.

via The changing face of eGaming | Vegas Seven.

I could have written much more about eDeck, and I’m probably going to do a podcast interview or two with some of the people behind it, since it really does have the potential to change how people gamble. There’s a lot of tech stuff that didn’t make it into the column but was really interesting.

New UNLV Gaming Podcast posted

We’ve got a new podcast up over at the Center for Gaming Research: April’s Gaming Research fellow, Theodor Gordon, gives a talk on tribal sovereignty and labor relations at tribal casinos. It’s a great summary of Indian gaming history with plenty of detail about current labor issues. Here’s the abstract:

The impact of tribal casinos on job creation is well documented. However, the increasing employment of non-Indians in tribal casinos creates new cultural and political challenges. What unique workplace anxieties emerge in a tribal casino? How might new tribal labor regulations impinge on tribal self-determination? In this talk, I address these questions through a systematic examination of tribal casino trade publications. By analyzing the language (especially the symbols and metaphors) mobilized by industry insiders as they disseminate strategies to mitigate these challenges, I demonstrate how recent developments in tribal labor relations reflect broader shifts in the boundaries of tribal self-determination.

Listen to the audio file (mp3)

View flyer (pdf)

It’s a great talk because it gives you a succinct summary of how Indian casinos developed and explains the labor situation very well. Theodor did a great deal of research during his month in residence, and it shows. The podcast series continues to be one of the real bright spots over at the Center.

Pre-shift OT suit

Harrah’s is being sued for making workers show up early without overtime pay. From the LV Sun:

A federal lawsuit filed Tuesday is the latest in a series of class-action pay claims filed by Nevada workers.This week’s case is against Harrah’s Entertainment. The suit alleges Harrah’s requires workers to arrive 10 to 15 minutes before their shifts start but doesn’t pay them for the extra time.

“Ten minutes before each shift may not sound like much” but multiplied by thousands of workers and their daily shifts, the unpaid wages could add up to tens of millions of dollars, says Reno labor lawyer Mark Thierman, who filed the suit on behalf of Harrah's Las Vegas dealer Kimberley Daprizio.

Pre-shift meetings, which include pep talks by managers and reminders about job standards and expectations, are common practice in the casino business and other customer service industries.

via Pay for pre-shift meetings spurs suit against Harrah’s – Wednesday, April 28, 2010 | 2 a.m. – Las Vegas Sun.

I used to grumble about this back when I worked security, and I think that my experience there gives me some perspective.

First of all, you’re going to have to be in the building before your official start time to get changed. For a shift starting at 3, I’d usually show up at 2:40, have time to change into my uniform (a striking electric blue blazer, white shirt, and black pants), grab a quick soft drink at the employee cafeteria, and head down to the pre-shift meeting, which we called roll call. At roll call, we learned what was going on in the casino that night, which was helpful, because if guests are asking you where an event is, it’s nice to know it beforehand and not have to call around. Also, the shift manager could run down the schedule and confirm that everyone scheduled was in fact in the building and ready to take their post.

Roll call would usually start at about 10 minutes of, be done by 5 minutes of, giving us time to get down to our posts and relieve day shift promptly by 3. Officers on escorts could radio in their positions and be relieved directly by officers dispatched from roll call. The system wasn’t perfect, but it worked well. I don’t remember ever being asked to sing or dance. I was willing to accept the cost of reporting to work 10 minutes early as the price of being relieved on time at the end of my shift; if everyone showed up at the exact start of their shift and then found their assignments and went out to them, the shift they were relieving would be leaving late every day.

I said the system wasn’t perfect, but we had a better deal than the supervisors, who had to get in at least a half an hour early and, since they were salaried, didn’t get overtime. But they did usually get an early out on their Friday, meaning that things more or less worked out.

So if you require hourly workers to clock in early each shift, why not compensate them with an early out (paid) on their Friday? By the end of the shift, most departments have personnel to spare since their breakers are done giving breaks. It costs the company marginally in increased wages (fewer spaces for unpaid early outs), but probably would generate good will in employees who feel that their time is valued.

It’s probably not a perfect system, but it’s better for both sides than rolling the dice in court.

I would also keep pre-shifts to a minimum–maybe five minutes at the most. Let them know what’s happening in the building, any big events, any HR stuff they need to do, give out commendations, and send them on their way. If you want employees to sing and dance, sponsor a quarterly talent show. I honestly can’t imagine any chain of events in which doing a song and dance before starting work would make me a more effective employee, and I don’t see how it would help other people either, unless their job was singing and dancing.

Marina Bay Sands opens

Big news in the international gambling scene, as the Marina Bay Sands has finally opened. From the Financial Times:

Singapore has imposed a charge of S$100 (US$73) a day or S$2,000 a year for residents to visit the tables as a way of calming vocal opposition to the casino developments from locals who fear a spread of gambling addiction and crime.

The government is also encouraging people with a gambling problem to add themselves voluntarily to a national blacklist of people who will be refused entry to the casinos.

However, analysts say the two resorts are likely to generate a flood of well-heeled overseas tourists, adding up to 1.6 percentage points to gross domestic product in a full year, according to official forecasts.

The government wants to buttress the island state’s burgeoning financial and manufacturing sectors with tourism earnings of S$30bn in revenues by 2015 – triple today’s figure.

The US$5.5bn Marina Bay Sands, a stunning development on the waterfront in the city’s business district, boasts a 1.2 hectare skypark, spanning three hotel towers and floating 220 metres above the pavement. The area is likely to become something of an architectural icon, even though the skypark bears a passing resemblance to a stranded boat.

Sheldon Adelson, chief executive of Las Vegas Sands, confirmed on Tuesday that the company expected to recoup its investment within five years, with a Singaporean contribution of more than US$1bn a year to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation.

Genting’s development, the US$4.7bn Resorts World at Sentosa, opened in February. It appears popular with punters, although no figures have been published.

The resort, located on an offshore leisure island, will have four hotels when it is fully open, together with a Universal Studios theme park and the world’s largest oceanarium alongside the gaming tables.

via FT.com / Companies / Travel & Leisure – Singapore opens second casino resort.

Extrapolating from the information in the article, the Singapore government wants to use the casinos to triple tourism revenues to S$30 billion. That means they expect the casinos to add S$20 billion a year in total revenue, which is about US$14.6 billion.

The entire Las Vegas Strip, which includes two dozen casinos and more Cirque shows, ultralounges, and meeting rooms than you can count, made $13.8 billion last year. Even with a theme park at Sentosa Island, I’m not sure expecting two casinos to lead a $14.6 billion increase is realistic.

Vegas needs more fun

Las Vegas is far in the rear view mirror as New York tops a list of “fun cities” compiled by portfolio.com:

Portfolio.com/bizjournals created a comprehensive formula to evaluate the opportunities for fun in the nation’s 100 largest markets.

The process began with the collection of federal statistics for 14 relevant types of businesses, from retail stores and restaurants to gambling casinos and golf courses. Each market was graded on both the volume total number and the concentration rate per 100,000 residents of such businesses.

Results were then grouped in seven broad categories of fun: shopping, food and drink, culture, popular entertainment, gambling, and high-impact and low-impact sports. The best scores went to markets that performed well in a wide array of categories. See the methodology sidebar for details.

Second place on the list of America’s fun places belongs to Chicago, which ranks among the 10 leaders in six of the study’s seven categories. Its best performances are third place for food and drink and fourth place for popular entertainment.

Rounding out the top 10 are Boston, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland Maine, Philadelphia, and Minneapolis.

via New York Tops As Americas Best City To Have Fun – Business News – Portfolio.com.

You can check the interactive index to see how your favorite city did. Las Vegas scored thusly:

RANK: 26
GAMBLING: 1
SHOPPING: 81 (retail trade establishments)
POPULAR ENTERTAINMENT: 54 (motion picture and video exhibition establishments, spectator sports establishments, amusement parks and arcades)
CULTURE: 29 (performing arts companies, museums, and historical sites)
FOOD AND DRINK: 44 (full-service restaurants and drinking places)
LOW-IMPACT SPORTS: 88 (golf courses and country clubs, marinas, and bowling centers)
HIGH-IMPACT SPORTS: 65 (skiing facilities, fitness centers, and recreational sports centers)
FUN SCORE: 2.04

Las Vegas didn’t do that badly, though we missed out of the top quartile. The methodology seems a bit casual: essentially the editors counted how many of a variety of institutions a city has, from golf courses to museums, and figured the ranking based on that.

I’m most surprised that there are 87 cities with more golf and bowling than us; sure, we don’t have many marinas, but I’d think that the golf alone would put us over 50. I’m even more surprised that the shopping rank is only 81.

I had trouble finding the “methodology sidebar” that explains in detail how they did the survey, but it doesn’t look like there’s any weighting for population. With the New York City metro area having a population of 18,922,571, it’s no shock that they’ve got more shopping, restaurants, and museums than everyone else and top those categories. But how did Portland, Maine get into the top 10? The city has a shopping rank of 3, meaning it has more retail establishments than Los Angeles, with a population of 512,357 vs 12,784,612. And there’s no way that Portland, Maine has more restaurants (rank 27) than Las Vegas.

The more I look at this study, the less it says. But I wonder if the LVCVA is working on a crash course to make us more fun than Rochester, New York (18) or Bridgeport, Connecticut (15).

At least we topped the list in gambling.

Book review: Chasing the White Dog

Max Watman. Chasing the White Dog: An Amateur Outlaw’s Adventures in Moonshine. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010. 293 pages.

In Chasing the White Dog, Max Watman blends three spirits, so to speak: a bit of bootlegging history, going back to the Whiskey Rebellion, some reportage on the current state of moonshine (it’s a surprisingly large business), and a good helping of memoir, detailing Watman’s investigations and his own foray into home distilling.

I learned a great deal from the book, starting with the historical background, but more interestingly with the present-day goings-on. Moonshine isn’t just a relic of bygone days; it’s a multi-million dollar, interstate criminal operation, with much of the liquor distilled in Appalachia ending up in nip joints, unlicensed watering holes in large cities; Philadelphia is the nation’s biggest consumer of moonshine. The connection between Hazzard County (so to speak) and North Philly is surprising but nonetheless important. Watman also chronicles the law enforcement officers who are ranged against the moonshiners, like Jimmy Beheler of Virginia’s Alcohol Control Board’s Illegal Whiskey Task Force, and concludes the book with a day-by-day recounting of a moonshine trial in Roanoke, Virginia. Along the way, Watman passes along some humorous asides, with “How (not) to be a criminal, Item X” footnotes, a running gag that both informs and entertains. Watman neither romanticizes the bootleggers (though some figures, like Junior Johnson, inevitably come across as larger than life), nor does he mock it…as a (sometimes) participant observer, he calls it as close down the middle as possible.

The material about Watman’s own experiments with home distilling reflect his passion for spirits. He’s able to share his excitement at finally producing a passable batch of applejack well with his readers. Whether they share that excitement probably has more to do with their appreciation of liquor than anything else; non-drinkers won’t find much to relate to, though they will still find plenty to marvel at, from the technical aspects of setting up a working still to the development of artisanal distilling, paralleling the boom in micro-breweries. Watman’s final thoughts make a strong case for legalizing home distilling under a certain threshold, whether you want to distill your own spirits or not.

All in all, it’s a fun read about a fascinating subject that may get serious whiskey drinkers thinking about looking beyond the local supermarket when it comes to buying something to drink.

Green cuisine at Bellagio

In honor of Earth Day, I gave this week’s Green Felt Jungle an environmental twist:

The casino resorts of the Las Vegas Strip do not spring to mind as environmentally sound institutions. From their blazing marquees to their overflowing buffets, they seem to be studies in excess. With the current mindset conflating any sort of personal indulgence with environmental degradation, casinos seem a lost cause.But many casinos have made great strides in delivering a little slice of decadence to their patrons in ways that use fewer resources and are more cost-effective. If protecting the environment is important to patrons, it stands to reason that they will sooner spend their money at a vacation resort that works to minimize its environmental impact than one that doesn’t.

via Bellagio offers fine example of embracing green, cuisine | Vegas Seven.

Fun story to research. The sheer scale of everything at Bellagio was amazing, and there’s nothing I like more than walking the back of the house to see how everything gets put together. I had another interesting factoid about slot machines that I didn’t use because I couldn’t fit it into the column, but I think it’s interesting anyway. I’ll see if I can find it and append it here later on.

Keep the champagne on ice for now

My extended commentary on February’s Nevada gaming numbers is out in the Las Vegas Business Press. Here’s the start:

The February gaming revenue numbers for Nevada caused some cheer around the state and on Wall Street. Total casino win rose 13.9 percent, the first double-digit increase in nearly three years. But if this is cause for celebration, it should be a muted one; there are still signs that the state's gaming decline is far from over, and this resurgence is resting on an increasingly narrow reed.

For one, much of the increase was due to the calendar. The Chinese New Year, always a big gambling holiday, fell in February, while in 2009 it fell in January. With much of the increase in win coming from baccarat, a favorite game of visiting Asian high rollers, it is likely that the true organic increase in gambling was far more modest.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : Gaming win is nice, but hold the celebration.

I wrote this as an counterbalance to what I perceive as the overly Panglossian view that you often get from reading other people’s interpretations of the numbers. Even in the face of decline, some were asserting that this was still the best possible result in the best of all possible worlds. And this isn’t much of a resurgence, since if you look at the actual levels of play for most games besides baccarat, they’re not that impressive.

I’ve been thinking a lot about something Tyler Cowen said at the APEE conference I attended last week. He talked about 4 different kinds of potential recovery from the recession: U, V, W, and L-shaped. Both U and V are rapid returns to the status quo ante bust, while W is a “double-dip recession.”

Well if you thought double-dipping was the worst scenario, you’re wrong: Cowen raised the possibility of an L-shaped recovery, which means that we’re not really going to recover at all–we’ll just limp along for the next 20 or 30 years with no economic growth. Ouch.

I don’t know what the prognosis for the national economy is, but it seems to me that there’s a very real danger that we’re looking at an L-shaped recovery for Las Vegas. I don’t want to spoil your mood too much so I won’t even mention Cowen’s pessimism about the local real estate market, but the tourist economy is facing some real obstacles to growth that won’t be willed away.

I’d like nothing more than to be proven wrong, and for the big increase in baccarat to lead to a revival of growth on the Strip. But until a broader base of people have more discretionary income, it’s hard to see how overall visitation to Las Vegas can increase.

Old west is old in AC

Harrah’s is undertaking a massive renovation of one of the city’s historic gambling halls. From the AC Press:

Acknowledging that the cowboy concept has gone stale, Bally’s Wild Wild West Casino is preparing for a $1.5 million facelift to reinvigorate the aging casino just in time for the bustling summer crowds.

Bally's spent $110 million to build the Wild Wild West annex in 1997. The extravagant re-creation of the Wild West gave Atlantic City its first themed casino. Its whimsical surroundings were a welcome diversion from the drab casino floors prevalent in those days.

However, over the years, the casino has become woefully outdated. The robot-like, animatronic characters at Bally's Wild Wild West Casino have broken down, and there is no one around with the expertise to bring them back to life.So the grizzled prospector and his trusty old pack mule have stopped panning for gold. The talking vulture perched on a cactus has gone mute. The gunslingers no longer fire their six-shooters and Winchesters.The rest of the Old West-themed gaming hall seems a bit dead, too.

“It's a little old-fashioned,” Harry Gordon, a gambling customer from Toms River, said while gazing out at the landscape of faux canyons, fake waterfalls and pseudo frontier-town stores. “I would like to see improvements.”

Bally's parent company Harrah's Entertainment Inc. has toyed with the idea of getting rid of the Wild Wild West to make way for a new hotel tower and other attractions.For now, the western decor will stay. Customers are supposed to be captivated by a fake 1880s frontier mining town blended with high-tech lighting, sound and entertainment effects.Popular attractions included the animatronic people and animals that once came to life – talking, singing and gunslinging. As his pack mule brayed, the prospector would speak to customers while he panned for gold at the base of a mountain waterfall. A robotic vulture bobbed his head and talked from his cactus perch. At Lillie Mae's Social Club bordello, two animatronic call girls beckoned customers from a balcony overlooking the casino floor.

Now those characters are still. Domenico said that most of the robots simply wore out over the years and have stopped working. The company that installed them in 1997 has since gone out of business and there is no one available to make repairs, he said.

via pressofAtlanticCity.com: Bally’s Wild Wild West getting $1.5 million makeover – including a mechanical bull.

Technically I guess everything is aging, but only in the casino industry would you describe something built barely 13 years ago as “aging.”

The thing about the animatronic robots breaking and being able to be repaired isn’t just a Harrah’s thing. It happened to Kamelion, a robotic Doctor Who companion of the 1980s, which was cutting edge technology at the time. Unfortunately, it’s inventor/operator died suddenly without letting anyone else know how to operate the complicated machine.

There’s really not much excuse for letting the vultures, etc fall into disrepair these days, though, since there is probably some engineer who will repair them–for a price. Sam’s Town doesn’t have any problem keeping its animatronic animals up and running.

As far as the bigger picture goes, outside of the mechanical bull and the stage, I’m not sure how much $1.5 million is going to buy for a makeover. And I’d love to see the proposal to tear down a $110 million building after 13 years to build another hotel tower at a time when visitation is dropping steadily.

The live music, though, is undeniably a good thing. It sounds like they’re on the right track.