Run the Strip with me

If you’ve been thinking about running in the Zappo’s.com Rock and Roll Las Vegas Marathon and Half-Marathon on December 4 but haven’t been sure, this might tip the scales. You can–guaranteed–run the half marathon with me.

I’ll be leading the 1:52 half-marathon pace group, so if you don’t mind a somewhat leisurely pace, I’d love to see you on race night. Yes, race night. This year they’re running the race at night (well, early evening). The marathon kicks off at 4:00 and the half-marathon gets going at 5:30. That means that, if you’re running with me, you should be back at Mandalay Bay by 7:30.

If the prospect of spending nearly two hours of your weekend running up and down the Strip with me holding a pace sign isn’t inducement enough, I can offer you the “don’t” as well. If you want to run the race but absolutely don’t want to run into me, if you run it at any other time you’re just about guaranteed to have a completely Dr. Dave-free race. And if that’s not incentive enough, I don’t know what is.

I’m looking forward to the race being a little different this year–I’m not sure exactly how and when the parking is going to work (the official site says “coming soon!”), but I’m sure I’ll figure something out.

If you want to register or just check out the event, you can check the official race page.

Dreamer’s paradise reality check in the LVBP

My column in this week’s Las Vegas Business Press is out. It’s a meditation on what less ambitious Strip developments really mean for Las Vegas.

With just about everyone in the industry mistaking the 2005-2007 boom for a new normal, it made tons of sense to trade in your sun-faded casino for a newer, bigger one with higher revenue per available room.It seems incredible that the 2000s saw exactly as many big casino demolitions as the 1990s four in each decade, but the Strip’s upside seemed so limitless that the present seemed little more than a springboard to better times.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : Dreamer’s paradise hit with dose of reality.

I think there’s a lot to this story. What does it mean when we stop shooting for the stars?

And that little factoid about casino demolitions surprised me. If you want to stretch it, you can say there were actually more in the 2000s. Here’s my complete list, though I kept a few out for each decade. The ones I counted are in bold”

1990s: Sands, Dunes, Hacienda, Landmark, Marina, Vegas World

2000s: Desert Inn, Stardust, New Frontier, Boardwalk, Bourbon Street, Castways/Showboat, Sahara (closed, destruction almost inevitable)

I might have forgotten one or two.

Linq’s stirring up the Strip in Vegas Seven

When I was at the Linq-announcing press conference, I had many questions about how building this project would impact the casinos it will linq together. So I asked them. The result is this week’s Green Felt Journal in Vegas Seven:

With all due respect to artists’ renderings, the recent unveiling of plans for Caesars Entertainment’s Linq have people wondering just what the east side of the Strip will look like when the project opens in June 2013. But behind the aesthetic curiosity is another, more immediate question: How will the massive construction project affect guests and employees? Most of the initial dislocations will be behind the scenes, says Rick Mazer, president of Harrah’s Las Vegas, Flamingo, Imperial Palace, Bill’s Gamblin’ Hall & Saloon and O’Sheas.

via Stirring up the Strip | Vegas Seven.

To me this is the interesting aspect of the story right now–how’s all of this construction going to work, and how will they keep negative externalities to a minimum? They seem to have a plan, and it will be interesting to see how well it goes.

I’m most curious about what’s going to happen on the Imperial Palace’s casino floor, and I’m looking forward to walking around it when it’s in the middle of being transformed, just to get that old>>>new under construction vibe.

Trekkie Nightlife in Vegas Seven

At long last, an article that I wrote during the recent Creation Entertainment Star Trek convention is out as this week’s Green Felt Journal in Vegas Seven:

The first thing you see walking into McFadden’s at the Rio is William Shatner in his full late-1960s Technicolor glory on one of the wide-screens that’s usually devoted to SportsCenter. Even with the sound off, you can tell in a second that this is the climax of “Balance of Terror,” when his Romulan nemesis tells him he has one last duty, and that in a different reality they might have been friends.

You know that everyone else here knows it, too. You’re in the right place.

via Nightlife on the Starship Enterprise | Vegas Seven.

This was a fun one to write, because I’m a Star Trek fan (this shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who follows me on Twitter). The convention itself was a real experience, one that I hope to write more about.

As far as this piece goes, it was not an easy one to write. I had spent about an hour at McFadden’s trying to think of how I was going to tie this all together. Luckily, I’d been watching “Balance of Terror” on Netflicks the week before, which just happened to be playing on the TVs when I came in.

But I didn’t know how I was going to pull it all together until I saw the woman–who at first looked like a respectable middle-aged HR manager or schoolteacher, showing off her tattoo. So that became the emotional center of the story. From there it became a matter of building up to it.

I’d already written one draft when I was sitting in the vendors’ room doing a rewrite. Now my problem was finishing the piece. I wanted to tie it back to what’s happening in Vegas now, and why it’s important to cater to groups like Trekkies. But I was coming off as too preachy.

Then I saw a guy wearing a green wraparound captain’s tunic, and couldn’t help but noticing his Galaxy-class paunch stretching the fabric to the limit. Which got me thinking about William Shatner, and his SNL skit back in the 1980s when he told fans to “get a life.”

Boom. Something clicked in my brain, and it all fell into place.

So that’s how the piece came together. I hope you like it.

Cut costs or invest? in the LVBP

My Las Vegas Business Press column on the dubious benefits of cost-cutting in a hospitality company is out today:

It goes without saying that there are several ways to cut costs. Shaving off some perks — first-class travel for jet-setting execs or caviar in the employee dining room — makes eminently good sense when revenues are down. Likewise, optimizing employment levels, which often means finding ways to do more with less, can help strengthen a hospitality company’s bottom line and competitive position if it’s done sensibly.

But not all cost-cutting provides a net benefit.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : Cut costs now or invest for the future?.

I still don’t understand why you would want to incentivize your executives to make decisions that hold costs down without regard for performance or guest satisfaction. I don’t have any problem at all with people being well compensated for their work (I know I wouldn’t turn down a bigger paycheck if someone offered it to me, and it’s hypocritical to assume that others would), but they should be rewarded for either improving results or delivering better service, not just keeping costs down.

That’s my two cents, anyway. Though if I start cutting costs, I might only give you one cent’s worth next time.

Staycations in Vegas Seven

It’s Thursday, so that means another Vegas Seven. This week, I look at the Vegas staycation in the Green Felt Journal:

Not everyone has the luxury of a Malibu summer home or the accrued sick/personal leave to spend their summer crashing in the Pacific waves or touring the Continent, so Las Vegans have increasingly turned during the recession years to a marriage of convenience: the Vegas staycation, where locals stay on the Strip and act like tourists.

via Staycation, All I Ever Wanted | Vegas Seven.

I absolutely love the art for this story.

And I’m really interested in learning about why people staycation…if you’ve got any thoughts, go ahead and share them.

Talking Strip Safety on Two Way Hard Three, and more commentary

Yesterday morning, after I read about the second homicide on the Strip in less than two weeks, I decided to write a short piece for Two Way Hard Three about why it was important for the County and Metro to get in front of the issue:

But most people have the perception–or at least the hope–that they’ll get lucky, or at least have a swingin’ time ending up broke. So, despite millions of visitors proving that regression to the mean is a money-making concept each year, people continue to gamble in Vegas–and buy lottery tickets, pick ponies, and visit casinos around the world.

When deciding what to do for fun, vacationers have no problem choosing perception over reality.

That’s worked to Vegas’ advantage, but what happens when perceptions shift from fun to fearful?

via Safety on the Strip | Two Way Hard Three | Las Vegas Casino & Design Blog | from ratevegas.com.

Early this morning, after a fight at O’Shea’s casino, a third visitor to the Strip is dead. By late this afternoon, Metro had announced it was shifting resources in response to concerns that the Strip has become unsafe.

I think this is a start, but I think that, given the Strip corridor’s high profile and critical importance to the state as a whole (gaming revenues from the Strip account for more than 50% of the state’s total), it might be time to strategically rethink law and order on the Strip.

In the piece I briefly discuss how a “broken windows” approach might be the right idea. It worked in New York City in the 1990s (read this City Journal article to get the specifics) and I’ve been advocating its use Downtown for a while now (I remember talking about “nuisance abatement” on a Vegas Gang quite some time ago).

On the surface the recent murder spree on the Strip seems to be three cases of (allegedly) alcohol-fueled violence ending in death, but the bigger question remains: why do people suddenly feel like anything goes on the Strip? I think the general feeling of encroaching lawlessness that others have noted over the past few months has something to do with it.

I had an interesting Twitter exchange this morning with Resorts CEO Dennis C. Gomes, who’s been focused in Atlantic City but who spent much of his career in Nevada, about the pedestrian safety issue, which he agrees “has become a major issue.”

When I asked him what he thought, as a casino operator, the Strip operators should do, he replied that, “It is more a matter of Strip properties taking the initiative which will happen if their revenue becomes threatened.”

Clearly something’s been happening behind the scenes, and it’s good that Metro is trying to get the Strip under control. Ultimately, I think that the casinos and the county will have to work together–strategically, not just in response to flare-ups of violence–to make the Strip corridor feel safer and, more importantly, actually be safer.

Sahara sale preview on Two Way Hard Three

Just in case you haven’t caught it on the Twitter feed, I’ve got two new posts up on Two Way Hard Three in which I share some photos I took Monday at a media preview for the Sahara Liquidation sale. Here’s a sample:

IMG_0631

Click here for the first patr

and here for the second.

Enjoy!

An open letter to the NRA in the LVBP

The more I’ve been thinking about the situation on the Strip, the more I’m convinced that those who have a major stake in the continued viability of the Strip as a walkable pedestrian thoroughfare really need a better response to the performers/panhandlers/salespeople who are crowding out the tourists. So I wrote an open letter to the Nevada Resort Association, the body that represents the state’s gaming and resort industry, in the latest Las Vegas Business Press:

As a rule I don’t write open letters; I’ll leave that to someone with an axe to grind, whether it’s because their neighbor’s dog won’t stop barking or mind control rays are seeping through their artfully constructed tin-foil hat. In the next few paragraphs I don’t want to raise a grievance, just encourage a robust discussion of an issue that’s important to the economic health of Nevada.

To put it bluntly, the situation on the Strip and downtown with costumed “performers” and other assorted smut peddlers, water, liquor and drug salesmen, and even three-card monte hustlers intimidating and preying on passers-by has gone from nuisance to menace. It’s getting difficult to walk very far–whether it’s on the sidewalk or on the pedestrian bridges that link major properties — without being hassled.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: Opinion : Street ‘performers’ should be checked, regulated.

What bugs me is that the NRA was able to lobby the Clark County Commission for a change in the law that basically criminalized Dotty’s, the slot parlor/tavern chain that 99% of visitors to Vegas will never set foot in, but it has been mum when it comes to the deteriorating condition of the pedestrian Strip, something that impacts a good number of the visitors that pay for hotel rooms and spend money in Las Vegas.

Why is it that the county is willing to fight a protracted legal battle to put Dotty’s out of business, but won’t investigate ways to limit the nuisance that licensed, unregulated “businesses” on the Strip present to our visitors? I’m not aware of any public safety issues associated with Dotty’s; no brawls over tchotkes between grandmas spilling out into the street, no grievances from patrons about the hard candy being substandard. But talking to Metro and to visitors to Vegas who walk the Strip, I’ve heard plenty of complaints and even what sound like legitimate concerns over public safety. What gives?

At the very least, Metro needs to be empowered to tackle those who are out-and-out breaking the law–particularly the 3-card monte hucksters and the liquor salesman. Setting up discrete areas where performers can ply their trade without impinging the ability of pedestrians to get from point A to point B is another idea that deserves, at least, serious consideration.

We really ignore the impact that street-level safety and comfort concerns have on future visitation at our own peril. Those who are entrusted with running the state’s resort industry should spend a few hours riding along with Metro–or just try walking from the MGM Grand to Caesars Palace one night–to get a better idea of what they’re up against.

Which will we see first? in Two Way Hard Three

In case you missed it, I’ve got a slightly-more-serious but still fun piece up on Two Way Hard Three about various longshots on the Las Vegas Strip:

With a renewed push for a casino smoking ban in Nevada, I go to thinking: which would happen first–no smoking in a casino, or a casino dress code? They are both changes that some people think would improve the casino experience, but would probably be fought tooth and nail by most operators. I just can’t see them turning away a player because he’s in a t-shirt instead of a sportcoat, or because he wants to smoke.

Still, I thought it would be interesting to consider which of these following scenarios might happen first.

via Which will we see first? | Two Way Hard Three | Las Vegas Casino & Design Blog | from ratevegas.com.

It’s just a thought exercise, but I think it’s useful to try to see around the corner and predict what’s going to happen. It’s obvious that the status quo isn’t going to continue forever, so it’s interesting to try to guess what’s going to stay and what’s going to go.