Casino debt levels’ adverse effects in LVBP

My commentary piece on casino debt came out in the Las Vegas Business Press yesterday:

Like households, all businesses take on debt as a part of their usual operations. Without borrowing money, it is difficult, if not impossible, to grow. Casinos are no different; for decades, theyve been borrowing money to build, expand and renovate. Over the past four years, however, casino debt levels have risen to unprecedented heights, something that may have an impact on the financial performance of Nevadas casino industry in the future.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : Casino debt levels could adversely affect future.

I think this is a topic that hasn’t gotten enough attention. It’s certainly got the potential to upset the applecart.

I’m aware that many analysts and experts don’t see problems with casinos having taken on this debt. But I’m also aware that many experts didn’t see any problems with casinos overleveraging themselves to take themselves private or investing on the continued growth of the condo market in Las Vegas. If more people with doubts had spoken up then, it’s possible that things would be different today.

And if you’re interested in what people who rate debt for a living think, Moody’s believes that debt might be a problem for certain Nevada gaming operators, too.

The Rise of Chinese New Year in Vegas Seven

In today’s Green Felt Journal in Vegas Seven, I’ve got a piece about Chinese New Year’s impact on Las Vegas:

Some people might consider the massive New Year’s Eve celebration—“America’s Party”—the ultimate night for Las Vegas casinos. True, that bash attracts more than 300,000 people each year. But ask the people charged with making money for casinos, and they’ll tell you that the holiday they really look forward to is Chinese New Year.

It is now arguably the second most important holiday in Las Vegas, right behind the “holiday” known as Super Bowl weekend. And it’s just about tailor-made for casinos: Traditionally, it’s considered propitious to gamble at the start of the new year.

via The Rise of Chinese New Year | Vegas Seven.

It’s definitely an interesting week on the Strip.

Three Intriguing People from Vegas Seven

The annual People Issue of Vegas Seven is out.  I wrote three profiles for it:

Aron Ezra: Wizard of Apps

Ezra is VP of Mobile for Bally Technologies

Fred Keeton: The Pathfinder

Keeton is VP of Finance for External Affairs and Chief Diversity Officer for Caesars Entertainment

 

Words of Caution in the LVBP

I’ve got a new column in this week’s Las Vegas Business Press:

Nor is this kind of chicanery limited to poker. MF Global was, until last November, a large global financial derivatives dealer, making its money on its traders abilities to correctly speculate on the upward and downward movement of prices for bonds, commodities, and currencies. Risky, yes, but, as with Full Tilt, these guys were supposed to know what they were doing.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : In poker and business, be careful whom you trust.

Even though online poker’s had some issues, it’s nothing compared to the messes we’ve seen in financial services industries.

November Revenue Run-down

I had a busy morning yesterday. Every month, the day that the Nevada Gaming Control Board releases its monthly revenues numbers is a busy one. As usual, I prepared the historical summary for the month in question (November this time) and updated the rolling six-month summary. Here are the highlights and links. First, the monthly historical comparison:

November was good for Nevada’s gaming industry. Most reporting areas saw a second straight month of increases in gaming revenues.
Generally speaking, handle rose along with revenues, indicating an at least modestly rebounding demand for casino gambling. Partially this was
because November 2010 was a particularly bad month, but the increase in several areas indicates a small recovery for the gaming industry.

Statewide, casinos bounced back (+7.06%) from an atrocious November 2010 and then some—this was the strongest November since 2007; though revenues were still well (-10.29%) below their 2007 equivalents, this is a move in the right direction. Slot revenue, handle, and hold percentage all increased, and this pattern held for table games as well. These increases were small but definite, lending credence to the notion of a mild rebound.

Las Vegas Strip revenues grew by 9.02%, driven by slightly (+2.40%) higher slot revenues and what appears to be a major bounce in table play (+17.90%). But this is only because November 2010 was exceptionally weak for table games. It was a decent, but not a great, month when factoring in the favorable comparison. Table handle grew less than 7%, and much of the gain was driven by higher table hold percentage.

Downtown Las Vegas increased revenues by slightly more than the state average (+7.26%), due to high slot win (+4.63%) and especially table win (+17.31%). Much of the table increase was due to higher hold, however, so the actual increase in play is not as dramatic as it first appears.

On the Boulder Strip, total revenues grew by 12.44%, keyed by a 64.47% increase in table win. This was only, however, because November  2010’s hold percentage was just 4.88%; total table play actually fell, but a return to a normal hold made play more profitable for casinos. Slot  handle and win increased respectably, indicating continuing strength in the Las Vegas locals market.

Washoe County revenues increased slightly (+1.95%), a welcome respite from the usual decline. This bump was due to higher hold, however, as  handle remained nearly constant from last year. Perhaps this indicates a stabilizing trend in Northern Nevada.

Tables for Statewide, Las Vegas Strip, Boulder Strip, and Washoe County follow

Nevada Gaming Statistics: November Comparison

Second, the six-month analysis:

Statewide, November built on a strong October, canceling out—and then some—the disappointing
August and September results. It looks like the mini-downturn of the late summer has reversed, which
bodes well for strong December.

The Las Vegas Strip now has five out of six months in positive territory. Particularly impressive are the
three months of double-digit gains and one near double-digit increase (November). Slot revenues have
increased in each month in the period, with table revenues less consistent, but still showing an overall
increase. The Strip is moving in the right direction, albeit, in the case of slot machines slowly, and in the
case of table games, inconsistently.

Downtown Las Vegas now has an overall positive trend for the past half-year, with four out of six
months showing increases in revenue for tables and slots. This may be the long-awaited Downtown
turnaround. Consistent improvements in slot revenue are the key, looking ahead, for future growth.

The Boulder Strip continues to impress relative to the rest of the state, with a revenue increase well
above the statewide average. While the overall economic indicators for the Las Vegas Valley continue to
remain flat or worse, this reporting area is outperforming its expectations.

Washoe County appears to be stabilizing. Three out of the past six months have seen slight (less than
2%) revenue increases, which may be a signal that the decade-long slide of Northern Nevada’s gaming
revenues might have reached bottom. There doesn’t appear to much room for growth, but this market
may be through the worst of its contraction.

Tables for Statewide, Las Vegas Strip, Downtown Las Vegas, Boulder Strip, and Washoe County follow

Nevada Gaming Statistics: The Last Six Months

And finally, I took a look at exactly what the numbers mean on Two Way Hard Three:

This appears, at first blush, to be a good month for Nevada casinos with no qualifications. There were, however, a few qualifications, though November was still a net positive for the state and the industry.

First, lets put November in context. The state’s gaming industry has been on a bit of a roller coaster, with an apparent recovery trend through much of the first half of 2011 ended by two consecutive months of declines (August, September). Then came October, which had an 8.12% increase in year/year revenues. Some started to believe that the recovery was back on track.

November makes it more likely that the state can anticipate further (modest) growth in its gaming industry. For the month, the state had a 7.06% increase in gaming revenues. And nearly every major reporting area posted positive results. For the first time in as long as I can remember, all five of the reporting areas I look at for my monthly reports (Statewide, Las Vegas Strip, Downtown Las Vegas, Boulder Strip, Washoe County) reported gains. That in and of itself is good news.

November in Nevada

That’s what I think. Share any of your opinions in the comments.

2011 Wrap-Up in the LVBP

In this week’s Las Vegas Business Press, I look back at 2011, trying to see what the big lessons are:

Closing the book on 2011 in the Las Vegas casino scene, one word comes to mind: paradox. There wasnt a clear trend leading us either into a more prosperous future or into the muck of even worse economic malaise. Instead, we got a little bit of everything, which means that the last page of this story hasnt been written yet.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : In 11, lots of noise, little certainty for casinos.

This is probably the last look back at 2011 I’ll do–from here on out, it’s looking ahead–at least until next December/January.

Looking back on Two Way Hard Three

In case you missed it, I’ve had two posts on Two Way Hard Three this week–each, in its own way, looking backward.

The first, Biggest Story of 2011–Six Nominees, breaks down what I think were the six biggest stories of 2011.

The second, The Las Vegas Hilton: Looking Back, takes a look…back at the history of the Las Vegas Hilton, which as of Tuesday became “LVH–The Las Vegas Hotel and Casino.”

So if you want a look at recent and not-so-recent history, that’s about 4,000 words worth of history for you to read.

Prohibition lessons for Net gaming in the LVBP

In an opinion piece vindicated by last Thursday’s adoption of online poker rules for Nevada and the DoJ ruling that the Wire Act only applies to sports betting, I argue in the Las Vegas Business Press that politics won’t trump pragmatism when it comes to online gambling.

The opposition of Adelson, who has solid political connections, particularly within the Republican party, would seem to render that possibility moot.Or does it?

Politics is only part of the online gambling equation, and, despite current appearances, not necessarily the most important part. A comparison with Prohibition, which banned alcohol in the 1920s, is instructive.

via Las Vegas Business Press :: David G. Schwartz : Prohibition may offer lessons for Net gaming.

I wrote this well before last Thursday…a week before, to be precise. That’s when the echo chamber was reverberating with news that Adelson was morally opposed to online poker. The “consensus” was that online poker was dead in the water.

But, as we saw, the politicians haven’t had the last word on this–at least, Congress hasn’t.

I’ve been saying for years now that the best way to handle online gaming is to let states regulate it. As with horse racing, states can decide on their own if they want to legalize online poker, then figure out how to split the revenues among themselves. And it looks like that’s where we’re headed.

Nevada’s Online Poker Regulations & My Busy Day

I’ve had a busy day. Going over yesterday’s changes to Nevada’s gaming regulations that open the door for online poker, I thought that it would be neat if someone created a sort of Cliff Notes guide to them. Then I realized that I was probably that someone. Five pages later, I was done. Here’s the executive summary:

On December 22, 2011, the Nevada Gaming Commission adopted amendments to its regulations that make possible the licensing and operation of online gambling operations within the state. Specifically, these regulations were amended:
• Regulation 3 (Licensing): Adds “operator of interactive gaming” and “service provider” to the list of entities that have to report “qualifying employees” to the Board.
• Regulation 4 (Applications): Creates three new categories of gaming license: manufacturer of interactive gaming systems, operator of interactive gaming, and service provider.
• Regulation 5 (Operations): Adds a new section, 5.240 Service Providers, to the regulations that currently govern the gaming operations; creates classes of service providers, defines them, and elucidates the disciplinary framework
• Regulation 5A (Operations): A new regulation that outlines exactly how online gaming will be conducted in Nevada.
• Regulation 8 (Ownership): Adds “operator of interactive gaming license, or a service provider license” to the list of licensees who must report loan/lease transactions to the Board.
• Regulation 14 (Manufacturers, Distributors, Operators): Adds language about interactive gaming systems to the devices covered and mandates that games display the rake and wagering limits.

Nevada’s Online Gaming Regulations: Changes Adopted December 22, 2011

There’s a lot more, including lots of details of what’s included in the regulations. It’s an interesting five pages if you’re a fan of gaming regulation or want to play online poker in Nevada.

I then wrote a semi-opinion piece for Two Way Hard Three about the changes:

So what does all this mean? Basically, that Nevada casinos will be able to start offering online poker as soon as they can get their systems together and get them approved by regulators.

How is all of this going to happen? There are going to be two ways casinos will offer online poker:

1. By building (or buying, or partnering with the supplier of) an “interactive gaming system” themselves. They would own it outright and run it.

2. By contracting with an “interactive service provider” to do the same….

Nevada Online Poker: What Just Happened? Two Way Hard Three

On top of that, I wrote up the UNLV Center for Gaming Research December Update and then fielded a bunch of calls about the Department of Justice memo that says, “Sorry for the confusion, but the Wire Act only applies to sports betting.

I can hope that the Wire Act being in the news will trigger a surge of interest in my 2005 book on the statute, Cutting the Wire: Gambling Prohibition and the Internet, but I won’t hold my breath. It being so close to the holidays, I can’t think of any better way to celebrate than by giving an academic monograph on federal gaming law as a gift to your loved ones. I’m only half joking there.

UNLV is closed next week thanks to budget austerity measures, so I’ll say thanks to everyone for an interesting 2011 right now. I hope 2012 is even better for all of us.

Reinventing the Party Machine in Vegas Seven

This week Vegas Seven released its nightclub issue. Since that’s such a big part of the casino scene these days, I thought I’d tackle the question of how clubs rebrand in this week’s Green Felt Journal:

In the wake of the Great Recession, nightclubs have been a crucial part of the identities and business plans of Las Vegas casinos. Major operators such as Wynn, the Venetian and even the storied Caesars Palace have made their clubs integral to their overall operations. Meanwhile, such resorts as the Palms and Hard Rock Hotel have built themselves almost from the ground up as party destinations. When clubs work, they generate buzz, foot traffic, ancillary casino gaming and food-and-beverage spending. But when they don’t, they can be a drag on a property.

via Reinventing the Party Machine | Vegas Seven.

It’s definitely a different aspect of the hospitality business, and one that, for the amount of money it brings in, generates surprisingly little literature. That might be by design.

Anyway, I had fun learning more about how nightclubs brand themselves, though it’s safe to say you won’t see me doing the bottle service thing anytime soon.