Program alert

I’m going to be on Face to Face with Jon Ralston tonight, talking about the effects of the economic slowdown on outlying casino markets like Mesquite, Jean, and Primm. If you’re in the Las Vegas area, you can watch on Las Vegas One (channel 19) at 5:30 p.m., 6:30 p.m., 8 p.m., 10:30 p.m. and 3 a.m.

If you’re from out of town, it looks like the shows are archived on the Face to Face page, so check there.

I’m on E! tonight

At least that’s what they tell me. I was interviewed for an episode of THS Investigates called “Vegas Winners and Losers.” I’m not sure which one I’m supposed to represent. We did the interview in front of a blue screen, so they could put me in front of any kind of backdrop. I’m guessing that if I’m a winner, I’ll have a limo or something behind me, and if I’m a loser, I’ll be in some alley in front of a trashbin.

The show debuts on E! at 8pm EDT tonight, then is on again Saturday at 5pm and Sunday at 3pm. So set your DVRs.

I’ve got absolutely no idea to what extent I’m even on screen. I did talk for a while, but you never know. Particularly since I haven’t won or lost much in Vegas. And I don’t think I called anyone a loser or said anything particularly controversial.

But if you haven’t gotten your daily fix of my wit from today’s two posts, go ahead and check out E! tonight.

New LVBP article is elementary

Well, it’s a few days old, but you can still read it in the Las Vegas Business Press. Here’s a tease:

It’s often said that college athletes get the star treatment because they are, well, stars. When 100,000 people pack a stadium to hear a talk on Joyce’s use of light and dark imagery in “The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man”, they say, then English departments will get the acclaim — and funding — that football programs do.

Indeed, right here in Las Vegas, it’s plain to see that college sports are far more popular than academics. More than a decade removed from his stint as head coach of the Running Rebels, Jerry Tarkanian is still a public figure, even appearing in commercials. But what kind of name recognition does Wole Soyinka, a Nobel Laureate and true academic all-star, have among the general population? It’s doubtful you’ll see the acclaimed writer shilling used cars on your TV any time soon, because, despite his achievements, most people just don’t care.

Betting just might raise the profile of legitimate academics. If there is a line on a spelling bee — maybe the least useful test of intellect — imagine the kind of buzz that could be generated for college-level student achievement. How many students in PoliSci 102 will score over 90 on the final exam? What percentage of History 101 students will comprehend the professor’s explanation of the causes of the Civil War? The possibilities are endless.

Suddenly, the general public would have a reason to care about education (since preparing the next generation for the future is obviously not much of a draw). Organic chemistry and macroeconomics might elbow aside football and baseball as fan favorites. Academic departments could build huge arena/classrooms with the latest equipment. Maybe someone would finally discover Fermat’s Lost Theorem if there was an over/under on it.

Elementary, my dear Watson. Spelling that is

It’s another piece in the “modest proposal” vein, where I hope that by taking an idea to its logical conclusion, I can make people think about things in a different way. In this case, the idea is: what if people cared as much about education as they do about sports? I made the same point but hopefully a little better in a KNPR commentary that might have aired already.

You might remember a post a few weeks ago about the spelling bee. I really do find it compelling TV, and think it would be neat to try to televize other feats of academic achievement.

Then again, I thought that tivoing a Buck Rogers in the 25th Century marathon was a good idea. I can guarantee that most of those episodes are going to be deleted without being watched. I thought I’d get things off on the right foot by watching the episode where Gary Coleman guest stars as a boy genius cryogenically frozen in the 20th century and awoken in the 25th to become the president of a planet. Although it was a whimsical notion, the uninspired plot and bare-bones budget really killed most of the enjoyment. It’s not quite bad enough to fall into the “so bad it’s good” category, a la “Manos:” The Hands of Fate or anything by Ed Wood.

There is some funny stuff, though. The headquarters of the Earth Defense Directorate, apparently, are in the 1-bedroom apartment of Dr. Elias Huer. Seriously–you never see any kind of control room, or galactic senate–just a viewscreen in his room. And the wedding celebrations for Princess Ardala (who has a tantalizing array of metal bikinis, at least) and Buck featured entertainment by a quarter of roller skaters! It definitely dates the action to the late 1970s, in an almost endearing way.

All this is just my roundabout way of saying that I’m acutely aware that my taste in TV might not be for everyone, so I doubt that we’ll be seeing History 101 final exams broadcast on ESPN2 anytime soon.

The next WSOP TV?

I spend most of my time researching and interpreting the past. I think this has some relevance for us today, and it interesting on its own merits as well. But I usually get asked to prognosticate about the future: where will Las Vegas be in fifty years, which new casino will be most successful, etc, etc, etc. I usually beg off, because it’s a lose-lose proposition: if you successfully predict the future, people will say the answer is patently obvious. For example, I boldly predicted that I would not win the 2005 New Las Vegas Marathon, and I was correct. It would be easy to say that was an easy prediction to make: after all, I run about half as fast as the average marathon winner, and several elite runners were entered in the race, along with hundreds of recreational runners who are also way faster than me. Similarly, I’ve said that if current trends continue, Las Vegas will continue to grow, but that any one of a number of events, some of which we probably can’t foresee, could be harmful to the city and the gaming industry. Yes, that’s a vague, wishy-washy thing to say, but it’s about all I can say about the future with confidence because, unlike history, we don’t know what happened. But if I tried to dress this up as a “prediction,” people would rightfully say it was a waste of time.

The other possibility is that someone confidently predicts something, and the person is completely wrong. I heard that I guy said that air travel would never be possible, a few years after the Wright Brothers flew. We’ve all heard examples of this. Arthur C. Clarke even came up with a law describing the phenomenon.

Well, all that is just a long-winded way for me to say that I just might have seen the future. You might laugh, but if anyone thought televised poker games would be big entertainment back in the 1990s, you would have said they were crazy. I got this tidbit from the Las Vegas Hilton’s Hot Sheet:

The 2005 World Domino Tournament, which was held at the Las Vegas Hilton November 18-20, 2005, will begin airing on ESPN Deportes on March 21, 2006 at 10 p.m. ET. The telecast was produced in a reality show format and will include seven one- hour shows. The 2005 World Domino Tournament featured more than 40 teams from the United States, Latin America, and the Caribbean competing in a two-day tournament that featured the most skilled professional players. The 2005 World Domino Tournament is also scheduled to air in English on ESPN II in June.

You never know–this could be the next WSOP.

Speaking of the poker tournament, Harrah’s has a new World Series of Poker slot machine out:

No Bluff.
The World Series of Poker is now available as a video poker game. Try your hand at the World Series of Poker branded slot series.

See a Sneak Preview of the Game!

I didn’t sit through the whole Flash animation sequence, but it seems like every video poker game variant out there, but themed with the WSOP.

More poker on TV

When I saw this news, I groaned inwardly…ESPN is showing even more televised poker next year. I know this gem of knowledge because I got the press release straight from Harrah’s, along with a 2005-6 poker season schedule. Yeah, I just typed “2005-6 poker season” with a straight face.
Continue Reading →

GA to be funded by ESPN?

You can’t help but notice that poker is ubuquitous on television these days. New Jersey assemblywomen Joan Voss has, and she thinks that those who profit from the Hold’Em craze should pitch in when it comes to helping those with a problem.
Continue Reading →

Misplaced morals?

Adelphia Communications is going to start offering triple-x hardcore porn to its Southern California video-on-demand customers. I’m not posting about this because of any personal interest in hardcore porn, or just because I want to get lots of hits from people searching for “casino hardcore porn” or similar terms. Rather, I want to salute the brilliant writing of LA Times staff writer Sallie Hofmeister, who, by cleverly juxtaposing two paragraphs, made a sly point about would-be moralists.
Continue Reading →

GSN is GONE (from LV preferred basic, anyway)

GSN shows lots of casino-related shows, including poker. Come to think of it, I could substitute a few other channels (ESPN, Travel Channel, Discovery, and probably Lifetime too) in there, and it would read just as well.

But if you like to watch GSN, live in Las Vegas, and are too cheap to spring for digital cable from our friends at Cox, you are SOL.
Continue Reading →

TV tonight

If you care to see your humble correspondent on television (maybe), watch Vegas Whales Tales tonight on the Travel Channel. You can watch me narrate whacky and improbable, and possibly illegal stories of Las Vegas high rollers run amok.

Ranting about ESPN

Watching that ESPN series on sports and gambling, something struck me as odd, but I wasn’t sure exactly what it was, until I read this, from John Schwarb of the St. Pete Times:

Not to pile on too much against ESPN (in this space last week we questioned its anchors being advertising pitchmen), but we could have lived without the five-part SportsCenter series “Gambling in Sports: The National Pastime” last week.

For one thing, the packaging of it with the ballyhooed Hustle movie was far too cute. We’re not stupid, we could see the network trying to work us into a degenerate gambling froth, preferably one that would end Saturday night on the couch with their latest foray into original programming.

Parts of the SportsCenter series were laughable, others lazy and less informative than they should have been. A segment on the point-shaving scandal with the 1993-94 Arizona State men’s basketball team relied on old interviews with all parties, failing to show what the guilty are doing now.

A segment on poker’s underbelly – young people spending countless hours and money playing online – rang hollow considering how much ESPN promotes this foolishness. The network is not to blame for an individual’s decision to mortgage the future on card games, but after glorifying poker for hours every week, showing a few minutes on its dark side seems trite.

On the whole, it is hilarious to watch SportsCenter turn into 60 Minutes when “investigating” gambling. The undertones of betting on an all-sports network are constant, either in subtle forms (the never-ending ticker) or in your face (“Hammerin”‘ Hank Goldberg’s Sunday morning football picks).

Perhaps any investigations could start within the Bristol, Conn., offices, where Mike Freeman reported in his 2000 book ESPN: The Uncensored History that gambling was rampant.

Instead, we’re subjected to a five-part series ending in a Pete Rose movie. Oh, well, we watched it all, so you win, ESPN. Again.

Rant: ESPN gambling series comical

Now I remember what was so odd: the channel that ran a countdown clock on their bottom line that ticked off the seconds until the next episode of the WSOP being a little sanctimonious about gambling. It’s great when people and organizations contradict themselves so blatantly that this transcends hypocrisy.

Not all TV is bad–a new episode of The Wire aired last night. It’s honestly the only show that I regularly watch, and it just keeps getting better.